Girls Gone Wild ruled NOT PORN by judge!

[Peaches]

Originally posted by Kt Doodles@Mar 10 2004, 11:32 AM
Hmmm, perhaps I am misunderstanding this a bit, but since WHEN was it alright for underage children to be on porn films anyway???
Sure, sure THEY might not have been touching anyone, but those tapes DO involve at least SOME girl/girl contact.

Regardless, these girls (flashing or more) were UNDERage...and GGW was STILL able to sell those images!! I am utterly amazed.

Perhaps I am not savvy enough to the law, would someone care to explain???

It's all in how the law is worded. If FL law says Child Pornography has to involve physical contact and there was none...well.....

There are thousands of pictures of nude children which aren't legally child porn. An example of a child "flashing" on film would be Brooke Shields in Pretty Baby - perfectly legal and she was only 12 years old.

They probably should have gone after another charge.