Slick today on gfy

[tony404]

Originally Posted by Jace

while I do agree with your point, I also think that a TOS is only as good as the person that wrote it, and in court TOS's get thrown out all the time

and also, there is FAR more going on here than a TOS....my opinion is that someone higher up, far above Directnic, was investigating or inquired about all this...I think once Directnic gets their ducks in a row, we will most likely hear about how they were working with another agency

hell, even google has the domain listed as "possible child porn" now, which makes me think someone else is pushing buttons

TOS's get thrown out all the time, got some examples ?

[Jace]

Originally Posted by tony404

TOS's get thrown out all the time, got some examples ?

nope, sure don't, just going off what a very well known lawyer in the adult industry said in his forum on another board

[tony404]

Originally Posted by Jace

nope, sure don't, just going off what a very well known lawyer in the adult industry said in his forum on another board

Go back and ask him for examples Im curious and if it did happen I cant image how much money that would cost.

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by Jace

nope, sure don't, just going off what a very well known lawyer in the adult industry said in his forum on another board

hahaha Jace thats weak bro... try it like this;

TOS gets thrown out all the time as it is referenced on This Thread over on This Board and was posted by This Guy who graduated This Law School and pratices law out of This Law Firm.

apparently reading about the law or laws that pertain to this industry is derfinitely not good enough without links heh heh


spaz

[Jace]

Originally Posted by spazlabz

hahaha Jace thats weak bro... try it like this;

TOS gets thrown out all the time as it is referenced on This Thread over on This Board and was posted by This Guy who graduated This Law School and pratices law out of This Law Firm.

apparently reading about the law or laws that pertain to this industry is derfinitely not good enough without links heh heh


spaz

very true very true, hell I can't even find the thread now where he talked about it, guess I will start a new one and await his reply

[softball]

"Where did you get your law degree?"
Same place you got yours, Tony. My apologise if you are a lawyer, but by your advice I would guess not.

[tony404]

Originally Posted by rhetorical

"Where did you get your law degree?"
Same place you got yours, Tony. My apologise if you are a lawyer, but by your advice I would guess not.

Im not a lawyer but I know how business works,I worked in the real world for many yrs before coming to the porn world. Just because you dont agree with it doesnt make it illegal, also if your going to do business with a company and read their tos and disagree with it . Find another company to do business with. Whats so hard to understand.if you agree to their rules thats it pretty cut and dry. also has slick said if it was cp or not and who the sponsor was or did that get forgotten about ?

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by tony404

also has slick said if it was cp or not and who the sponsor was or did that get forgotten about ?

Nobody realizes this is the main issue.

[Jace]

let me just also state ONCE AGAIN, since people are starting to think I am siding with Slick on this one

I think both parties handled this extremely wrong

I also don't think the TOS of DirectNic had ANYTHING to do with this....there are WAY too many signs pointing to a high government agency involved with all this

I think the niche Slick was working in was a doomed one to begin with, and I don't' think he should have been as surprised as he was to find his sites shut down

I also think that Directnic should not have gotten as upset as they did over forum posts and moved his deadline up without telling him

all in all, I think this is all extremely stupid, and I probably am not going to spend much more time typing or thinking about it, there is just no reason for me to other to argue with peaches on who is the better arguer

one more thing, I don't think that a TOS should allow a company to do whatever they want, whenever they want......