![]() |
Slick today on gfy
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=687404
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Sounds like he finally found an attorney.
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
so, he made public what Directnic did and they got mad?
seems pretty childish and I still think they were in the wrong I am sure the fact that they lost THOUSANDS of domains registered in their system didn't help either, I know of at least 1500 domains gone from there personally |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
If you have a contract with someone else for them to kill that person, it may be a legally "binding" contract with the legalese, but could someone truly enforce a contract to break a law? If there are privacy laws involved (and that hasn't been confirmed or denied yet), no TOS in the world could force someone to break the law to comply. |
Re: Slick today on gfy
LOL, Rhetorical is still posting to me? Dude, you've been on IGNORE for WEEKS. Grasp that concept, please. :lol: :lol: :lol:
And LM, yes, TOS can supercede the law in many jurisdictions. I've said this MANY times before. I signed a contract with my HOA that says I can't paint my house pink or they'll fine me and put a lien on my house. Or they can come and paint it, charge me for it, and put a lien on my house. It is NOT illegal in GA to paint a house pink. But a contract CAN supercede laws. Not all of them, but it's done - daily. |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
And yes, I know you're going to say "those people should get a lawyer", but realistically your average joe buying domains (adult or otherwise) wouldn't be able to do that. |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
LMFAO. He got an email about the content on his sites and went to GFY because "I always figured that GFY is the place to find out information on everything".
Another typical GFY moron. |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
Now... "TOS can supercede the law in many jurisdictions" That is ludicrous. You need to go back to school. Or you have really bad legal advice. In fact the situation you described does not back up your silly argument. |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
You gotta read the posts, tony. This is not about CP it is about the law. It is about who enforces that law. Not private militias or bounty hunters. But legally constituted bodies. DN is not one of them. They had a legal route and there are agencies to deal with this. It is about enforcement. One more time CP is a red herring. Listen up. |
Re: Slick today on gfy
this may be the 1st time ive ever seen peaches call someone dude, that i can remember anyway
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
FIRST thing I would have done would be to call DirectNic, instantly, and talk with someone in charge.....seems like he waited til the 2nd or 3rd til he even tried that |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
and also, there is FAR more going on here than a TOS....my opinion is that someone higher up, far above Directnic, was investigating or inquired about all this...I think once Directnic gets their ducks in a row, we will most likely hear about how they were working with another agency hell, even google has the domain listed as "possible child porn" now, which makes me think someone else is pushing buttons |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
Really? |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
In response to a legal request submitted to Google, we have removed 2 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read more about the request at ChillingEffects.org. http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=1496 Child Pornography Complaint to Google |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
TOS gets thrown out all the time as it is referenced on This Thread over on This Board and was posted by This Guy who graduated This Law School and pratices law out of This Law Firm. apparently reading about the law or laws that pertain to this industry is derfinitely not good enough without links heh heh spaz |
Re: Slick today on gfy
let me just also state ONCE AGAIN, since people are starting to think I am siding with Slick on this one
I think both parties handled this extremely wrong I also don't think the TOS of DirectNic had ANYTHING to do with this....there are WAY too many signs pointing to a high government agency involved with all this I think the niche Slick was working in was a doomed one to begin with, and I don't' think he should have been as surprised as he was to find his sites shut down I also think that Directnic should not have gotten as upset as they did over forum posts and moved his deadline up without telling him all in all, I think this is all extremely stupid, and I probably am not going to spend much more time typing or thinking about it, there is just no reason for me to other to argue with peaches on who is the better arguer one more thing, I don't think that a TOS should allow a company to do whatever they want, whenever they want...... |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
"Where did you get your law degree?"
Same place you got yours, Tony. My apologise if you are a lawyer, but by your advice I would guess not. |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
Really? |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
nair or wax? |
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
|
Re: Slick today on gfy
Quote:
Ive always drawn strength from it. I prefer to call that the big picture while the main issue is who had stuff on the net in out community so far down the path that Sig and Mike AI would question it as child porn? Mike has shot his fair share of that genre to know the real deal when he sees it. And I cant recall an instance of Sig going off half cocked. I suspect that theres more here than meets the eye. I for one applaud the effort that DirectNic is making to help legitimize this industry. However I do not think I would have the balls to go as far as they already have gone. As in many cases 2007 will reveal some very interesting truths. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 PM.. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022