Slick today on gfy

[softball]

Originally Posted by tony404

Peaches your wasting your breathe, people refuse to see how things are done in the grown up world. Also LM this was US company to Us company we dont have privacy laws like Canada so that argument doesnt work. Reading these things the past few has really turned my stomach and for the first time made me ashamed to be in adult. Defending possible CP and condemning a company who acted responsible are condemned for acting like the internet police,when we all should be active in policing that shit. turns my stomach.

You gotta read the posts, tony. This is not about CP it is about the law. It is about who enforces that law. Not private militias or bounty hunters. But legally constituted bodies. DN is not one of them. They had a legal route and there are agencies to deal with this. It is about enforcement. One more time CP is a red herring. Listen up.

[edward]

this may be the 1st time ive ever seen peaches call someone dude, that i can remember anyway

[softball]

Originally Posted by edward

this may be the 1st time ive ever seen peaches call someone dude, that i can remember anyway

LMFAOROF

[tony404]

Originally Posted by rhetorical

You gotta read the posts, tony. This is not about CP it is about the law. It is about who enforces that law. Not private militias or bounty hunters. But legally constituted bodies. DN is not one of them. They had a legal route and there are agencies to deal with this. It is about enforcement. One more time CP is a red herring. Listen up.

They had a TOS he agree to it, so they can enforce it. You sign a contract, you got to follow the rules.

[Jace]

Originally Posted by tony404

They had a TOS he agree to it, so they can enforce it. You sign a contract, you got to follow the rules.

while I do agree with your point, I also think that a TOS is only as good as the person that wrote it, and in court TOS's get thrown out all the time

and also, there is FAR more going on here than a TOS....my opinion is that someone higher up, far above Directnic, was investigating or inquired about all this...I think once Directnic gets their ducks in a row, we will most likely hear about how they were working with another agency

hell, even google has the domain listed as "possible child porn" now, which makes me think someone else is pushing buttons

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Jace

while I do agree with your point, I also think that a TOS is only as good as the person that wrote it, and in court TOS's get thrown out all the time

and also, there is FAR more going on here than a TOS....my opinion is that someone higher up, far above Directnic, was investigating or inquired about all this...I think once Directnic gets their ducks in a row, we will most likely hear about how they were working with another agency

hell, even google has the domain listed as "possible child porn" now, which makes me think someone else is pushing buttons

Really?

[Jace]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Really?

http://www.google.com/search?q=reall...ient=firefox-a

In response to a legal request submitted to Google, we have removed 2 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read more about the request at ChillingEffects.org.

http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=1496

Child Pornography Complaint to Google

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Jace

http://www.google.com/search?q=reall...ient=firefox-a

In response to a legal request submitted to Google, we have removed 2 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read more about the request at ChillingEffects.org.

http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=1496

Child Pornography Complaint to Google

Really?

[Jace]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Really?

no

[tony404]

Originally Posted by Jace

while I do agree with your point, I also think that a TOS is only as good as the person that wrote it, and in court TOS's get thrown out all the time

and also, there is FAR more going on here than a TOS....my opinion is that someone higher up, far above Directnic, was investigating or inquired about all this...I think once Directnic gets their ducks in a row, we will most likely hear about how they were working with another agency

hell, even google has the domain listed as "possible child porn" now, which makes me think someone else is pushing buttons

TOS's get thrown out all the time, got some examples ?

[Jace]

Originally Posted by tony404

TOS's get thrown out all the time, got some examples ?

nope, sure don't, just going off what a very well known lawyer in the adult industry said in his forum on another board

[tony404]

Originally Posted by Jace

nope, sure don't, just going off what a very well known lawyer in the adult industry said in his forum on another board

Go back and ask him for examples Im curious and if it did happen I cant image how much money that would cost.

[spazlabz]

Originally Posted by Jace

nope, sure don't, just going off what a very well known lawyer in the adult industry said in his forum on another board

hahaha Jace thats weak bro... try it like this;

TOS gets thrown out all the time as it is referenced on This Thread over on This Board and was posted by This Guy who graduated This Law School and pratices law out of This Law Firm.

apparently reading about the law or laws that pertain to this industry is derfinitely not good enough without links heh heh


spaz

[Jace]

Originally Posted by spazlabz

hahaha Jace thats weak bro... try it like this;

TOS gets thrown out all the time as it is referenced on This Thread over on This Board and was posted by This Guy who graduated This Law School and pratices law out of This Law Firm.

apparently reading about the law or laws that pertain to this industry is derfinitely not good enough without links heh heh


spaz

very true very true, hell I can't even find the thread now where he talked about it, guess I will start a new one and await his reply

[Jace]

let me just also state ONCE AGAIN, since people are starting to think I am siding with Slick on this one

I think both parties handled this extremely wrong

I also don't think the TOS of DirectNic had ANYTHING to do with this....there are WAY too many signs pointing to a high government agency involved with all this

I think the niche Slick was working in was a doomed one to begin with, and I don't' think he should have been as surprised as he was to find his sites shut down

I also think that Directnic should not have gotten as upset as they did over forum posts and moved his deadline up without telling him

all in all, I think this is all extremely stupid, and I probably am not going to spend much more time typing or thinking about it, there is just no reason for me to other to argue with peaches on who is the better arguer

one more thing, I don't think that a TOS should allow a company to do whatever they want, whenever they want......

[softball]

Originally Posted by tony404

They had a TOS he agree to it, so they can enforce it. You sign a contract, you got to follow the rules.

Not if the TOS are illegal in the first place. You can sign a legal contract to break the law and the execution of the contract is illegal.

[tony404]

Originally Posted by rhetorical

Not if the TOS are illegal in the first place. You can sign a legal contract to break the law and the execution of the contract is illegal.

Where did you get your law degree? Your assuming its illegal because you dont like the outcome. That was probably written by a room full of lawyers. I hope he sues them it would be something to see the look on slicks face when the judge asks if it was cp and if not did he have the proof it wasnt.