Trueteenbabes.com

voodooman · 01-08-2003

This is amazing. This site has many underage girls
in, well, not so revealing, but pretty skimpy outfits.
James Grady, owner of the site suffered 880 counts
of pornography.
Now, all the models on this site had letters that had
been signed by their parents permitting them to model
for this site.

Anyone know anything about this?
Any thoughts on right or wrong?

I for one think no matter how much or how little the
model shows, its wrong to exploit underage girls and
maybe the parents really didnt know what their kids
where getting into.

01-08-2003

I have a friend whos daughter has a "Teen site" the girl is 12 and her mother has her believing that the 4000+ a month members that she has are all teens who look up to her as some kind of icon of the times. Then why is it that her banners have to be in a bikini and state that she is 12!?

Either she is in total denial of the whole ped thing or she is trying to make her daughter pay for her own college...the hard way.

BTW...the girls site is on a banner exchange with 'lil amber and is maintained and hosted by the same people.

Nuf said? I'll put away my soapbox now.

Torone · 01-09-2003

Bad enough, exploiting kids; but he sold a lot of content with false documentation. I even bought some of it; and had to dump it.

Wish I could remember the name of the company...Lpro or something like that.

Last edited by Torone at Jan 9 2003, 08:47 AM

spanno · 01-09-2003

I don't think blokes should be encouraged to look at young young girls as sex objects

and just because the parents signed something means to me they are bad parents and the law should be there to protect children from the parents as well as losers that try and sell their pics to pedos for profit

01-09-2003	#3
Torone Members Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 1,137	Bad enough, exploiting kids; but he sold a lot of content with false documentation. I even bought some of it; and had to dump it. Wish I could remember the name of the company...Lpro or something like that. Last edited by Torone at Jan 9 2003, 08:47 AM __________________ Why me? Why always me?

01-09-2003	#4
spanno Members Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 187	I don't think blokes should be encouraged to look at young young girls as sex objects and just because the parents signed something means to me they are bad parents and the law should be there to protect children from the parents as well as losers that try and sell their pics to pedos for profit __________________ find it here

01-08-2003	#1
voodooman Members Respin bullshit press Your Comments Are Welcomed Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 2,695	This is amazing. This site has many underage girls in, well, not so revealing, but pretty skimpy outfits. James Grady, owner of the site suffered 880 counts of pornography. Now, all the models on this site had letters that had been signed by their parents permitting them to model for this site. Anyone know anything about this? Any thoughts on right or wrong? I for one think no matter how much or how little the model shows, its wrong to exploit underage girls and maybe the parents really didnt know what their kids where getting into.

01-08-2003	#2
ShannonRush Guest Posts: n/a	I have a friend whos daughter has a "Teen site" the girl is 12 and her mother has her believing that the 4000+ a month members that she has are all teens who look up to her as some kind of icon of the times. Then why is it that her banners have to be in a bikini and state that she is 12!? Either she is in total denial of the whole ped thing or she is trying to make her daughter pay for her own college...the hard way. BTW...the girls site is on a banner exchange with 'lil amber and is maintained and hosted by the same people. Nuf said? I'll put away my soapbox now.