If your considering copy and pasting your latest drive by spam here because you cant find any other place.
DONT!
Oprano has a ZERO tolerance policy for spam. Yours WILL be deleted. If you are looking for more exposure for your product please contact advertising@oprano.com for more information.
Legacy Archived Main BoardBusiness chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.
Originally posted by Minte@Nov 11 2003, 05:32 AM Then it's ok to hate the Chicago Bears?
Good morning handsome! I think it's allowable to hate sports teams.. But not the players! No wait, I think that's covered under the player haters ball.. never mind. lol
Lady M... we're all doing well! Ryan is just now starting to crawl a little bit. It's so funny to watch. He's so wide awake all the time, taking in his surroundings.
What have you been up to?
__________________ I will talk shit about you if I think you wont find out.
Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 05:55 AM Because sexeducation is a MEMBER.... do ACTIONS include posting negative things?
*******************************
of course NOT!
Post a river...there are NO ANGELS here....
There's no angels, but there's an innocent in my tummy! :P
I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.
__________________
Need a kick-ass design done quickly?
I recommend Sex Creator - they absolutely ROCK.
Yes'm Chris, we have to love our colts - until recently, about the last time they had a really good year - was the stike year. Our subs were better than other subs.....hahahahaha
Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 09:28 AM I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.
Carrie, I think you are stretching things a little bit here.
I personally skip the morons posts. If he does something that is detrimental he will be banned. I doubt it will take that long for him to slip up.
__________________
Make big money on your Domains! Why wait 40 days to get paid with the other guys? Parked.com pays the most for your traffic, and cuts checks twice a month!
Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 09:28 AM I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.
Carrie, in this case you are in MUCH bigger troubles...
Serge responds: Luke, the author of that e-mail forgot to mention that: 1) I've beed spying for chinese goverment for 17 years and still sell them plans of nuclear submarines. 2) I had homosexual relations with every presidential candidate. 3) KGB VP' is my classmate and I e-mail him daily all government secrets I learnt on the board. 4) Lee Harvey Oswald was married to my sister.
they hang you 7 times for posting on the same boards I post.....
Serge responds: Luke, the author of that e-mail forgot to mention that: 1) I've beed spying for chinese goverment for 17 years and still sell them plans of nuclear submarines. 2) I had homosexual relations with every presidential candidate. 3) KGB VP' is my classmate and I e-mail him daily all government secrets I learnt on the board. 4) Lee Harvey Oswald was married to my sister.
they hang you 7 times for posting on the same boards I post.....
Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 06:28 AM I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.
There are other boards where some people post that have much worse offenders than sexed posting, only difference is they are not retarded enough to let everyone know.....ya might want to think about that for a minute...
If posting on the same board as people breaking the law makes you guilty by association we're all fucked.
Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 06:28 AM I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.
well, at least we now know why you decided to not become an attorney.
Poor guy spent more time stroking himself than he did screwing her.
Note to guys: never try to screw a primadonna when there's a camera around. She'll be making love to the camera, not you! :P
__________________
Need a kick-ass design done quickly?
I recommend Sex Creator - they absolutely ROCK.
Originally posted by eatapeach@Nov 11 2003, 02:56 PM hey carrie, what happened to travis?
it's just doesn't feel like oprano if i don't feel some repressed gaiety when i read your posts
I got the first draft for our new site today and I liked it so much I had to celebrate a bit (the avatar is a chunk out of the tour). Fight the Patent brought up a good point - everyone will think it's my legs, lol.
It's funny. No one thinks Vick is a cartoon or Serge is a nekkid statue but I am what my avatar is... hmmm. I could do evil things with that...
Sorry about Travis going though. It'll change again eventually and I'll have some sexy hunk back up there. Probably him!
__________________
Need a kick-ass design done quickly?
I recommend Sex Creator - they absolutely ROCK.
Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 06:28 AM I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.
Carrie ...
you are a LIAR and you know it.
You are "attacking the financial health" of my company and should be banned.
There has NEVER been pictures of video of children engaged in sexual acts on SexEducation.com.
You should be banned.
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
11-11-2003
h34r: PETA be watchin you, boy 
Linear Mode
