Shelleehale your site is screwed up in IE6

[ScottMcGowan]

Originally Posted by ScottMcGowan

yeah! Take a fan sign type picture with the two of you and the date and shit! Let's keep this drama going! WOOooOOOoOoOo!

Oh yeah, Mark, I expect tits in this pic, btw.

[Hammer]

Shouldn't take Mark long to post a snap of Kedra and himself with this thread open on his monitor.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Shouldn't take Mark long to post a snap of Kedra and himself with this thread open on his monitor.

Hes in the import export business...what do you think he sells ??? porn?

add pompous asshole to his list of credentials.

[Hammer]

Okay, a snap of Kedra crying with Mark consoling her standing next to his monitor with this thread on it will be even better.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Right now, Kedra is talking to Shelle, and Shellee's doing a great job of making Kedra cry.

Nice going, Shellee. Hope you're proud of yourself. Nice going to you too Gonzo. You should both pat yourselves on the back now.

I'm gone.

No reason to cry if it isnt her.
But its a good excuse to bail when your busted again!

[Hammer]

hmmm... wonder why Mark deleted his post about Kedra crying right after I posted?

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Hammer

hmmm... wonder why Mark deleted his post about Kedra crying right after I posted?

He had to go import a webcam I guess.

Maybe the Rogue Charity Computer user with the Rogue MAC address has one.

[gonzo]

Mark why is your cam girl pleading with Shelle Hale to say that the girl is a look alike?

Is this why shes crying?

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

MAC Addresses are known in a LAN (Local Area Network) environment. For example, you can tell your wireless router to accept a connection from your wireless computer by allowing only its MAC address to connect. However this MAC address is not available via a WAN, or Wide Area Network because it is simply not transmitted as a part of any tcp/ip packet.

You can read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_address

I did not go read the article but I do know that a Mac Address can be read through a packet sniffer. So, they may not show in the tcp transaction received, they are part of the tcp packet.

[moetheman]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

MAC Addresses are known in a LAN (Local Area Network) environment. For example, you can tell your wireless router to accept a connection from your wireless computer by allowing only its MAC address to connect. However this MAC address is not available via a WAN, or Wide Area Network because it is simply not transmitted as a part of any tcp/ip packet.

You can read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_address

You read WIKIPEDIA articles for your info?

The MAC address does not need to be available on a WAN . . . all that is needed is the IP address. Once that is available, only a SECURE system would prevent someone (or someone's software) from obtaining the MAC address.

This is common knowledge.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Shouldn't take Mark long to post a snap of Kedra and himself with this thread open on his monitor.

Here you go Hammer! (Note that we included your post in the left-hand monitor)












Once again, Shellee, Where is your PROOF? Oh and nice job talking to Kedra on the phone just now. You said you had PROOF, so Where is it?

Gonzo, I think you need to point your LIAR rants in a new direction.

OWNED, Shellee. OWNED, Gonzo.

Oh and everyone, Kedra is a GREAT Converter and makes webmasters lots of money. You really need to send her your traffic. (Hey - at least someone can beniifit from the shitfest that this thread has become!)



Cheers all!

Mark Prince
http://www.2Much.net
http://www.LiveCamNetwork.com

[gonzo]

Dude you have no idea the ICQs Im getting.

Whats your paypal address?
I feel sorry for you.

Please dont stop.

Rcourt youve been bested!

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Hammer

hmmm... wonder why Mark deleted his post about Kedra crying right after I posted?

I made a mistake - I thought she was crying, but she was only laughing at Shellee Hale.

Mark Prince
http://www.2much.net
http://www.LiveCamNetwork.com

[Sexyteaser]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Mark why is your cam girl pleading with Shelle Hale to say that the girl is a look alike?

Is this why shes crying?

Kedra has informed me personally that the cam girl Bella is not her!

Wow that is a great likeness; I told Kedra I would reserve judgement until Bella got back online and I could see for myself.

[gonzo]

All this MAC address debate reminded me that we have a security advisor on staff here ....

The O signal has been ignited.

Would someone from Mitnick Security Consulting please answer a support call from your friends her at Oprano?

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

Kedra has informed me personally that the cam girl Bella is not her!

Wow that is a great likeness; I told Kedra I would reserve judgement until Bella got back online and I could see for myself.

Until then, Shellee, I guess she's guilty until proven innocent? Oh well. Whatever makes you happy. If the pictures above weren't proof enough then I guess you win. We have nothing more to prove to you. Enjoy the rest of your day.


Cheers all!

Mark Prince
http://www.2Much.net
http://www.LiveCamNetwork.com

[moetheman]

Originally Posted by gonzo

All this MAC address debate reminded me that we have a security advisor on staff here ....

The O signal has been ignited.

Would someone from Mitnick Security Consulting please answer a support call from your friends her at Oprano?

Oh SHIT Gonzo! You have THEM on YOUR SIDE?

My respects, Don Gonzo, my respects

Cheers,

MoeTheMan

[ScottMcGowan]

I thought I made it clear that we expected tits in the photos.

Sheesh. It's like trying to talk to a manhole cover.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Shouldn't take Mark long to post a snap of Kedra and himself with this thread open on his monitor.

Shellee, Gonzo: Now who's a liar? Read....

Hammer: I have been instructed to inform you that there is a special message waiting for you here:

http://www.ynot.com/index.php?name=P...=779929#779929

Cheers!

m

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by moetheman

Oh SHIT Gonzo! You have THEM on YOUR SIDE?

My respects, Don Gonzo, my respects

Cheers,

MoeTheMan

Kevin and Darci Wood are both friends of Oprano.

If you dont know the history of how that came about remind me to link you to the boards most popular thread of all time when you have a weekend to kill....

If you dont know Darci shes was one of those lab techie chicks on G4 with Leo Laporte etc.

You can check her blog out at http://www.agirlandhermac.com

Im sure they will be wrong too though.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Kevin and Darci Wood are both friends of Oprano.

If you dont know the history of how that came about remind me to link you to the boards most popular thread of all time when you have a weekend to kill....

If you dont know Darci shes was one of those lab techie chicks on G4 with Leo Laporte etc.

You can check her blog out at http://www.agirlandhermac.com

Im sure they will be wrong too though.

Sheez man, we don't need to be bothering Kevin and Darci (however Darci can show her cute little face anytime she wants as far as I'm concerned) We can solve the MAC Address debate real easy:

An http protocol packet has 5 layers:

The physical layer (actual computers)
The ethernet layers (this contains the MAC address of the two machines that are talking to each other - sender and reciever)
The IP layer - contains the destination ip
The TCP layer which contains the port info
and the http layer whc\ich contains the actual request

So, like I said, even though we normally do not see the ethernet layer (the MAC addresses) when we are doing our every day processing, it is there and can be detected by a packet sniffer.

here is the breakdown on a packet: from http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001...SD_Basics.html

---------------------------------------------------------------
Packet 10
TIME: 10:25:36.854420 (6.232947)
LINK: 00:00:B4:3C:56:40 -> 00:50:BAE:36:33 type=IP
IP: biko -> genisis hlen=20 TOS=10 dgramlen=44 id=0013
MF/DF=0/1 frag=0 TTL=64 proto=TCP cksum=26A7
TCP: port blackjack -> telnet seq=3205630181 ack=0000000000
hlen=24 (data=0) UAPRSF=000010 wnd=16384 cksum=7814 urg=0
DATA:
---------------------------------------------------------------Not counting the TIME heading, there are four parts to this packet. The LINK heading represents the Layer 2 frame. Normally, this is the portion of the packet that is monitored by the NIC; you'll note that it contains the MAC address of the sending computer and the MAC address of the destination computer. There are several different types of Ethernet frames; I can tell this is an Ethernet_II frame since it contains a "type" field.

More here http://www.newartisans.com/blog_file...tcp.packet.php

[Sexyteaser]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Here you go Hammer! (Note that we included your post in the left-hand monitor)

Once again, Shellee, Where is your PROOF? Oh and nice job talking to Kedra on the phone just now. You said you had PROOF, so Where is it?

Gonzo, I think you need to point your LIAR rants in a new direction.

OWNED, Shellee. OWNED, Gonzo.

Oh and everyone, Kedra is a GREAT Converter and makes webmasters lots of money. You really need to send her your traffic. (Hey - at least someone can beniifit from the shitfest that this thread has become!)



Cheers all!

Mark Prince
http://www.2Much.net
http://www.LiveCamNetwork.com

Well Mark as you might be aware I don't show all my cards at once. Some cards I am waiting to use in a more appropriate forum.. Now if you were recording the call or something then why don't you just post it for everyone to hear I pretty much laid out your whole scam to Kedra which is why she was crying. She has been selling this for you and I don't think she felt very good about selling a license to people for you to have a venue to steal from them.

All I can say is at my second conference I was warned in detail about you from another victim and since then they have come out of the wood work one by one, I hung on as long as could to gather as much evidence as possible and will use it as I please.

For anyone that is going to say then take legal action... let me reply with this suing Mark Prince who doesn't even own a home would be like walking to the toilet and tearing up the cash to flush away - He is worthless and he has so many victims a class action suit which is warranted would net me nothing but headaches a lot like these little rants that waste my time.

[moetheman]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Kevin and Darci Wood are both friends of Oprano.

If you dont know the history of how that came about remind me to link you to the boards most popular thread of all time when you have a weekend to kill....

If you dont know Darci shes was one of those lab techie chicks on G4 with Leo Laporte etc.

You can check her blog out at http://www.agirlandhermac.com

Im sure they will be wrong too though.

Allright!

Yes, please post the link, I don't have a weekend to kill but it sounds interesting . . .

And no, I didn't know Darci . . . checking out her blog right now.

[gonzo]

Hahaha I think I can afford to call in a few favors from them.
You know as well as I do they both hate liars as much as I do.

Should we call the new show LieBusters?

Originally Posted by sarettah

Sheez man, we don't need to be bothering Kevin and Darci (however Darci can show her cute little face anytime she wants as far as I'm concerned) We can solve the MAC Address debate real easy:

An http protocol packet has 5 layers:

The physical layer (actual computers)
The ethernet layers (this contains the MAC address of the two machines that are talking to each other - sender and reciever)
The IP layer - contains the destination ip
The TCP layer which contains the port info
and the http layer whc\ich contains the actual request

So, like I said, even though we normally do not see the ethernet layer (the MAC addresses) when we are doing our every day processing, it is there and can be detected by a packet sniffer.

here is the breakdown on a packet: from http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001...SD_Basics.html

---------------------------------------------------------------
Packet 10
TIME: 10:25:36.854420 (6.232947)
LINK: 00:00:B4:3C:56:40 -> 00:50:BAE:36:33 type=IP
IP: biko -> genisis hlen=20 TOS=10 dgramlen=44 id=0013
MF/DF=0/1 frag=0 TTL=64 proto=TCP cksum=26A7
TCP: port blackjack -> telnet seq=3205630181 ack=0000000000
hlen=24 (data=0) UAPRSF=000010 wnd=16384 cksum=7814 urg=0
DATA:
---------------------------------------------------------------Not counting the TIME heading, there are four parts to this packet. The LINK heading represents the Layer 2 frame. Normally, this is the portion of the packet that is monitored by the NIC; you'll note that it contains the MAC address of the sending computer and the MAC address of the destination computer. There are several different types of Ethernet frames; I can tell this is an Ethernet_II frame since it contains a "type" field.

More here http://www.newartisans.com/blog_file...tcp.packet.php

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by ScottMcGowan

I thought I made it clear that we expected tits in the photos.

Sheesh. It's like trying to talk to a manhole cover.

Very sorry, Scott!

I will ask Kedra for a Tit shot and get back to you.

In the mean time, here's a picture of another chat girl that works for us that may help you out.




Cheers!

Mark Prince
http://www.2Much.net/
http://www.LiveCamNetwork.com

[Sexyteaser]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Shellee, Gonzo: Now who's a liar? Read....

Hammer: I have been instructed to inform you that there is a special message waiting for you here:

http://www.ynot.com/index.php?name=P...=779929#779929

Cheers!

m

Mark,

What did I lie about? Be specific and when I proove you wrong and you go back under your rock maybe we can all go another couple months without you trying to take down me and Rachel to deflect from what your guilty of.

[moetheman]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Sheez man, we don't need to be bothering Kevin and Darci (however Darci can show her cute little face anytime she wants as far as I'm concerned) We can solve the MAC Address debate real easy:

An http protocol packet has 5 layers:

The physical layer (actual computers)
The ethernet layers (this contains the MAC address of the two machines that are talking to each other - sender and reciever)
The IP layer - contains the destination ip
The TCP layer which contains the port info
and the http layer whc\ich contains the actual request

So, like I said, even though we normally do not see the ethernet layer (the MAC addresses) when we are doing our every day processing, it is there and can be detected by a packet sniffer.

here is the breakdown on a packet: from http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001...SD_Basics.html

---------------------------------------------------------------
Packet 10
TIME: 10:25:36.854420 (6.232947)
LINK: 00:00:B4:3C:56:40 -> 00:50:BAE:36:33 type=IP
IP: biko -> genisis hlen=20 TOS=10 dgramlen=44 id=0013
MF/DF=0/1 frag=0 TTL=64 proto=TCP cksum=26A7
TCP: port blackjack -> telnet seq=3205630181 ack=0000000000
hlen=24 (data=0) UAPRSF=000010 wnd=16384 cksum=7814 urg=0
DATA:
---------------------------------------------------------------Not counting the TIME heading, there are four parts to this packet. The LINK heading represents the Layer 2 frame. Normally, this is the portion of the packet that is monitored by the NIC; you'll note that it contains the MAC address of the sending computer and the MAC address of the destination computer. There are several different types of Ethernet frames; I can tell this is an Ethernet_II frame since it contains a "type" field.

More here http://www.newartisans.com/blog_file...tcp.packet.php

Very interesting.

According to what I had read on the subject, the only reliable way to obtain the MAC addy is to either enter Layer 2 and get it yourself or (preferably) have software go there, grab it, and send it back to you . . .

Either way though, I agree that it is settled, insofar as my original point went: you can be tracked by MAC address on the internet.

Disclaimer: I am a Larval stage Pythonista/Rubyist . . . not into networking/security that much at all . . .

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by moetheman

Very interesting.

According to what I had read on the subject, the only reliable way to obtain the MAC addy is to either enter Layer 2 and get it yourself or (preferably) have software go there, grab it, and send it back to you . . .

Either way though, I agree that it is settled, insofar as my original point went: you can be tracked by MAC address on the internet.

Disclaimer: I am a Larval stage Pythonista/Rubyist . . . not into networking/security that much at all . . .

And my orignal post the hes a lying pussy trying to bully a woman while hiding under a sock puppet.

But running his cocksucker all day has been more enlightnening with information on
1. Company lay offs
2. Trying to buttfuck his clients and affiliates by double charging for a Playboy Mansion ticket so they could hang out with him in the corner next to the ice statues to be introduced to more players like him.
3. How he charges you an addition 5% hold back on top the the 5% CCBill holdback and calls it an export fee.


We didnt even get into the other parts like rebill skimming.

[ScottMcGowan]

Does Corinne have eyeballs?

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by ScottMcGowan

Does Corinne have eyeballs?

I think they are with Kendra's mole thats missing from Camsturbation.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

Mark,

What did I lie about? Be specific and when I proove you wrong and you go back under your rock maybe we can all go another couple months without you trying to take down me and Rachel to deflect from what your guilty of.

Oye..... on this thread

http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=89512

you said

It is Kedra and it was verified... So, why lie about it if you don't care?

You LIED because it was NOT verified. Once again you just thought it would be fun to stir up shit about a woman you are obviously intimidated by.

So Shelleehale, if it was not "Verified", then you LIED not just to me, but to everyone else on here.

m

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by gonzo

And my orignal post the hes a lying pussy trying to bully a woman while hiding under a sock puppet.

But running his cocksucker all day has been more enlightnening with information on
1. Company lay offs
2. Trying to buttfuck his clients and affiliates by double charging for a Playboy Mansion ticket so they could hang out with him in the corner next to the ice statues to be introduced to more players like him.
3. How he charges you an addition 5% hold back on top the the 5% CCBill holdback and calls it an export fee.


We didnt even get into the other parts like rebill skimming.

Try all you want Gonzo, you won't win this lame argument of yours. You know what though, if you would only ask me these questions instead of assuming shit like you always do, you (and your readers here) would learn a hell of alot. I have learned alot (and continue to learn) from all kinds of people and companies in this business. If you continue to be close-minded and just assume shit, you will never learn anything, and your members here will go elsewhere.

Did we lay off people in 2007?
Of course! Re-read the previous post on this subject. When revenues are down, any company has to do whats best and trim the fat. Even though sales remained constant, the US dollar forced us to do lots of changes. If anyone wants to learn from us about what we did, please don't be shy to ask me personally. Making a company more lean helps to be more effecient and helps reduce costs. If you don't understand this very basic concept Gonzo, I feel sorry for you.

m

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Did we lay off people in 2007?
Of course! Re-read the previous post on this subject. When revenues are down, any company has to do whats best and trim the fat. Even though sales remained constant, the US dollar forced us to do lots of changes. If anyone wants to learn from us about what we did, please don't be shy to ask me personally. Making a company more lean helps to be more effecient and helps reduce costs.

Layoffs (reducing labor) is used very often by businesses to save money because it is the EASIEST method of doing so. Labor is usually the most expensive part of a business so of course reducing that expense makes the profits go up. Unfortunately, it is also the method that causes the most stress for those involved and creates the most bad publicity because people often feel betrayed. But like I say, it is the easiest method so many Non-creative managers who don't want to have to think go this route.

There are many creative ways to raise that profit number but they require out of the box thinking and hard work and planning to implement.

just my 2 cents

[Hammer]

Nice tits on Corinne. I'd take those nipples and.... sorry, got a little carried away there.

Nice personal message on YNOT Kedra, even though Mark ended up using it for promotion.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Nice tits on Corinne. I'd take those nipples and.... sorry, got a little carried away there.

Nice personal message on YNOT Kedra, even though Mark ended up using it for promotion.

Sorry Hammer! I learned how to be a publicity whore from MEDIAGUY. (He da man!)

Cheers!

[moetheman]

Well, you can all be the judge . . .

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by moetheman

Well, you can all be the judge . . .

Whoever she is, she's almost as hawt as Kedra!

Cheers!

[pam]

Am I the only one who hasn't a clue who Mark or Shellee is? I've never even heard of his program but then again, I do very very little with cams since I work in niche and microniche.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by pam

Am I the only one who hasn't a clue who Mark or Shellee is? I've never even heard of his program but then again, I do very very little with cams since I work in niche and microniche.

Hi Pam,

My name is Mark Prince, and I'm the owner of 2Much Internet. (http://www.2Much.net). We make a program called LiveCamNetwork.com, and you can see it operate at http://www.LiveCamNetwork.com.

It's a pleasure to make your acquaintance!

Mark Prince
http://www.2Much.net
http://www.LiveCamNetwork.com

[Mediaguy]

Mark is being generous, I feel... but the obvious doesn't need more than simple ocular verification:

Note the differences in boobs, in tongue piercing, and in mole... just to point out the obvious that seems to have remained unspoken here.



Anhow, I want to thank everyone for what a great thread this was, very entertaining... and hey maybe the people from Camsturbator will end up over here too, pissing all over everyone... well, not me, I prefer to watch...

Gonzo (and I guess you too Pam - welcome to Oprano ) - Mark hasn't been explicit in telling what we do, and it's annoying to see. You refer to our "affiliates", which we don't have as 2much.net is a hosted software and services provider and not a consumer site. We refer to the people we do B2B with as clients or customers, site operators or owners, not affiliates.

One of the services we offer to webcam sites on our software is the opportunity to share out their models or enable those from different sites, even though they're basically independant. They can share content.

That's not "exporting". I guess you'd call it brokering...

2much buys from one and sells to the other "on the fly" as it were; this reseller system features the additional 5% holdback due to the risk we take transacting for others - 2much pays you the minutes bought from you, but there's no guarantee we get paid on the resale.

The software we sell however is what I think Mark meatn as an export.

(I know it's not a very dramatic contribution, just wanted to clear up a few things; carry on!)

[moetheman]

Originally Posted by gonzo

And my orignal post the hes a lying pussy trying to bully a woman while hiding under a sock puppet.

But running his cocksucker all day has been more enlightnening with information on
1. Company lay offs
2. Trying to buttfuck his clients and affiliates by double charging for a Playboy Mansion ticket so they could hang out with him in the corner next to the ice statues to be introduced to more players like him.
3. How he charges you an addition 5% hold back on top the the 5% CCBill holdback and calls it an export fee.


We didnt even get into the other parts like rebill skimming.

And you have certainly proved your point Gonzo.

The way you say "running his cocksucker" is pretty funny.

Notice how he backed off from the MAC address debate?

I still want Mr. Mitnick to come on here and give us his opinion though (just because I'm a geek)

I have a lot of respect for the guy. Among the reasons are:

8 fucking years in Lompoc was it? And a white guy? And he made it out in one piece? That's balls.

Fuck.

[Sexyteaser]

Mark,

Isn't it time to come back as "Soundslikebullshit" ? Or did you scare that guy who lives near you using your old computer logging into oprano and posting from the same IP/MAC or whatever to go away with those good ole scare tactics of yours.

[Sexyteaser]

Originally Posted by Mediaguy

Mark is being generous, I feel... but the obvious doesn't need more than simple ocular verification:

Note the differences in boobs, in tongue piercing, and in mole... just to point out the obvious that seems to have remained unspoken here.



Anhow, I want to thank everyone for what a great thread this was, very entertaining... and hey maybe the people from Camsturbator will end up over here too, pissing all over everyone... well, not me, I prefer to watch...

Gonzo (and I guess you too Pam - welcome to Oprano ) - Mark hasn't been explicit in telling what we do, and it's annoying to see. You refer to our "affiliates", which we don't have as 2much.net is a hosted software and services provider and not a consumer site. We refer to the people we do B2B with as clients or customers, site operators or owners, not affiliates.

One of the services we offer to webcam sites on our software is the opportunity to share out their models or enable those from different sites, even though they're basically independant. They can share content.

That's not "exporting". I guess you'd call it brokering...

2much buys from one and sells to the other "on the fly" as it were; this reseller system features the additional 5% holdback due to the risk we take transacting for others - 2much pays you the minutes bought from you, but there's no guarantee we get paid on the resale.

The software we sell however is what I think Mark meatn as an export.

(I know it's not a very dramatic contribution, just wanted to clear up a few things; carry on!)

Omg take a photo of her in the same position you might have a different result - but don't worry we will soon have the proof we have all been waiting for..

By the way you don't call them affiliates well looky here http://www.lcncash.com/

and some of my affiliates that signed up claim they were spammed with LCNcash following their sign-up on ccbill you want that proof on here as well?

[sarettah]

Shellee. The href with the kids is still there in your front page code. In addition, Google has it indexed from when it was on the celebrity page of the site (I looked and it is not there now) and it looks to me like it is indexed on your main page.

You really need to get that out of there and the sooner the better.

Just my 2 cents.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...licks.com+kids

Look at the text under the second result.

edited in: in fact, Google has picked up the kids ref on at least 4 of your pages

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22na...e=off&filter=0

Hit the link to show omitted results.

[Sexyteaser]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Shellee. The href with the kids is still there in your front page code. In addition, Google has it indexed from when it was on the celebrity page of the site (I looked and it is not there now) and it looks to me like it is indexed on your main page.

You really need to get that out of there and the sooner the better.

Just my 2 cents.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...licks.com+kids

Look at the text under the second result.

edited in: in fact, Google has picked up the kids ref on at least 4 of your pages

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22na...e=off&filter=0

Hit the link to show omitted results.

Well damn - all in 24 hours anyone else that successful with indexing a site overnight?

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

Well damn - all in 24 hours anyone else that successful with indexing a site overnight?

lolol...I've had them go in that quick before. Google knows all

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

Well damn - all in 24 hours anyone else that successful with indexing a site overnight?

It's easy really, just post a link on Oprano...

...and I'm not just trying to be funny, I'm dead serious.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

Mark,

Isn't it time to come back as "Soundslikebullshit" ? Or did you scare that guy who lives near you using your old computer logging into oprano and posting from the same IP/MAC or whatever to go away with those good ole scare tactics of yours.

Just keep grasping at those straws, Shellee. Do anything you can do to cling on to anything that brings you happiness.

Why don't you spend your time fixing your site and removing the KIDS link from your website instead? Or don't you know how?

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

Omg take a photo of her in the same position you might have a different result - but don't worry we will soon have the proof we have all been waiting for..

By the way you don't call them affiliates well looky here http://www.lcncash.com/

and some of my affiliates that signed up claim they were spammed with LCNcash following their sign-up on ccbill you want that proof on here as well?

Shellee,

Read the message that Greg posted. He said 2Much.net has no affiliates, not LiveCamNetwork.com.

And sure Shellee, go ahead and send us more of your "Proof" that we spam people. Whatever floats your boat.

We're all going out for a few beers now. I suggest you do the same. Or just go drink alone, I don't care.

[Jace]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

Well damn - all in 24 hours anyone else that successful with indexing a site overnight?

almost always