Shelleehale your site is screwed up in IE6

[sarettah]

just thought I would let you know...

[Sexyteaser]

I just loaded it yesterday and am working on getting all the bugs worked out.. how did you even find it?

[Sexyteaser]

Why are you using IE6 do you need the link to upgrade?

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

I just loaded it yesterday and am working on getting all the bugs worked out.. how did you even find it?

Umm.. you posted a link to it in Nymphs thread?





(I didn't realize you were blond)

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

Why are you using IE6 do you need the link to upgrade?

Why upgrade?? I stay pretty far away from the bleeding edge if I can. If I wanted to be a microsoft beta tester I would go fill in an application

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Why upgrade?? I stay pretty far away from the bleeding edge if I can. If I wanted to be a microsoft beta tester I would go fill in an application

Just buy VIsta

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Just buy VIsta

Exactly

[Sexyteaser]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Why upgrade?? I stay pretty far away from the bleeding edge if I can. If I wanted to be a microsoft beta tester I would go fill in an application

Well your talking to an x-microsoftee but its nice that your beta testing for me for free; thanks for the information I really appreciate it.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

Well your talking to an x-microsoftee

So, I can blame you for all the shit that got released untested and for the stupidity and obfuscation inherent in asp with vbscript ?

but its nice that your beta testing for me for free

It wasn't on purpose. I looked because Nymph complemented you on it. When I saw it in IE I just thought you would like to know.

thanks for the information I really appreciate it. kthumb

You're welcome.

[Sexyteaser]

You could if you wanted but paid users were used for beta testing for many years so blame them. But Obfuscation would not apply here and most of what you are saying is obsolete but since you are still using it let me sell you some old netscape hardware to complement what your running on.

[moetheman]

Originally Posted by sarettah

So, I can blame you for all the shit that got released untested and for the stupidity and obfuscation inherent in asp with vbscript ?

What are you doing using MicroShaft "technology" anyway?

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

You could if you wanted but paid users were used for beta testing for many years so blame them. But Obfuscation would not apply here and most of what you are saying is obsolete but since you are still using it let me sell you some old netscape hardware to complement what your running on.

Just because MS calls something obsolete does not make it so.

There are plenty of places that have not gone to NET yet, there are many more running both NET and straight old ASP. Hell, there are still mainframes out there running COBOL and handling everything just fine. I saw 2 ads come across my monster the other day for fucking RPG and there are still plenty of places running DOS apps.

As far as what I run on, I have a myriad of hardware and software. I am a developer and have to be able to test in multitudes of environments. So, I have XP boxes both home and Pro, a Win98 install, a Media center install, an old NT install, a Linux with php4/mysql4, Linux with PHP5/mysql5, hell I even have access to a MacIntosh.

For browsers I have IE6, IE7 and an old IE5 install, FF 1, FF1.5 and I think I threw a new copy on one of the boes the other day so I might have 2. I have safari for Mac and Windows, I have IE for Mac (sucks beyond belief)

And obfuscation applies to many things when it comes to MS and it's products.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by moetheman

What are you doing using MicroShaft "technology" anyway?

I use ASP at the day job. It wasn't my call...lol. Rick (our network admin) and I have been pushing for a nix server for a log time now.

[soundslikebullshit]

hahaha at first i thought it was made with frontpage but if you do a view source of the index page I get this

// (C) 2000 www.CodeLifter.com
// http://www.codelifter.com

and if you go to codelifter.com you see this

CodeLifter 5.0 is a source code viewer used to see
code on http:// html pages, including pages
blocked under no-right-click scripts, trapped in
windows without file menus or url boxes, and
'referrer' pages that cannot be seen in the browser.
Also see style .css and JavaScript .js files, etc. CodeLifter is ideal for viewing, studying, and copying http:// page and file code.

so great another thief in the adult world. i doubt you are ex microshaft. more like just another big talker. oh well. next time you steal shit you should remove the evidence before you start spamming yer shit

[soundslikebullshit]

wow there is worse shit in there.

a href="Kidshttp://www.freewebsitetemplates.com">Kids

kids? kids? lady wtd what are you promoting anyway ??? teens is bad enuf clean yer code!

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

You could if you wanted but paid users were used for beta testing for many years so blame them.

Has nothing to do with the paid testers. They don't decide when to release.

There is one way to tell for sure if an MS product will go to the street untested. If MS makes a big hoopla about it, it will be shit when it hits the street. I noticed that back at DOS4. They made all sorts of noise abut DOS4, when it ht the streets it was breaking peoples boxes. meanwhile, abot 3-4 months later they very quietly released DOS5.0 which was tremely stable and was the standard until everything went windows.

Win95, big hype, shitty product. Win98, not much hype, stable product. Winnt, no hype, stable product. etc etc etc Including Vista, lotsa hype, piece of shit product.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by soundslikebullshit

wow there is worse shit in there.

a href="Kidshttp://www.freewebsitetemplates.com">Kids

kids? kids? lady wtd what are you promoting anyway ??? teens is bad enuf clean yer code!

Which site is all that shit from?

[soundslikebullshit]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Which site is all that shit from?

Go to http://www.naughtyclicks.com/

then click on viewsource in ie. scroll down passed the Codelifter theft announcement and theres a link to kids. right now it looks just like a placeholder or sum shit but fucking still people you gotta be careful these days i mean fuck! anyway its just another link site to the same old shit we have all seen already so who cares. ha ha, owned.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by soundslikebullshit

Go to http://www.naughtyclicks.com/

then click on viewsource in ie. scroll down passed the Codelifter theft announcement and theres a link to kids. right now it looks just like a placeholder or sum shit but fucking still people you gotta be careful these days i mean fuck! anyway its just another link site to the same old shit we have all seen already so who cares. ha ha, owned.

I went and looked. Yeah, saw that shit in there too. Makes you wonder don't it?

[soundslikebullshit]

it really does. kiddie porn is fucking sad and anyone who even jokes about it is a sick fuck. to be fair to the webmaster it just looks like he stole the code and called it his own but didn't look at it closely enough. theif? pedophile? both be twisted. any lawyers reading this :: what happens if you accidentally have this shit on your site?

[soundslikebullshit]

yo i just read more about codelifter. its free to download or they sell you a license for $20 or so but its truly for lazy mofos coz the code if gives you you could learn yourself easy. and even if youre a complete dumbass you still cant copy and run that code without knowing other things such as file permissions if the code was in perl for example. anyway shelleehale dont steal it makes baby jesus cry

[softball]

wow, you guys are talking freeking Swahili or something. I have no idea what all this shit means.

[Sexyteaser]

>>>hahaha at first i thought it was made with frontpage but if you do a view source of the index page I get this

>>>// (C) 2000 www.CodeLifter.com
>>>// http://www.codelifter.com

What you are making reference to here is part of the free "Bookmark Us" script that the web designer used. But you know this. It is Obvious from looking at the code. Anyone reading this thread can go there and look for themselves and see that you are just being a malicious pathetic asshole . . .

>>>and if you go to codelifter.com you see this

>>>CodeLifter 5.0 is a source code viewer used to see
>>>code on http:// html pages, including pages
>>>blocked under no-right-click scripts, trapped in
>>>windows without file menus or url boxes, and
>>>'referrer' pages that cannot be seen in the browser.
>>>Also see style .css and JavaScript .js files, etc. CodeLifter is ideal for viewing, studying, and copying http:// page and file code.

And you will also see several other tools on there, not just that one, but once again you know this, as it is obvious from reading the codelifter website . . . once again, anyone with half a brain can see that for his or herself by going to the site and reading about the tools on offer there.

>>>so great another thief in the adult world. i doubt you are ex microshaft. more like just another big talker. oh well. next time you >>>steal shit you should remove the evidence before you start spamming yer shit

What a pathetic, sorry little POS . . . insulting the intelligence of the ENTIRE board, as if people could not see for themselves that you are maliciously taking that markup out of context . . . how PATHETIC . . . is this the best you can do? You are truly laughable . . .

[Sexyteaser]

>>>wow there is worse shit in there.

>>> a href="http://www.freewebsitetemplates.com">Kidshttp://www.freewebsitetemplates.com">Kids
>>>

>>> kids? kids? lady wtd what are you promoting anyway ??? teens is bad enuf clean yer code!

Low blow, and you know it, you pathetic little F Authority slime, how DARE you bring that into this, damn well knowing - AS IT IS OBVIOUS FROM READING THE CODE - that what happened was that a FREE TEMPLATE was used by a web designer, who inadvertently left a FEW SNIPPETS OF CODE in the new website, snippets that don't even show on the interpreted version of the website. The template used was:

http://www.freewebsitetemplates.com/preview/fashionhut/

Pathetic . . . once again, IS THIS THE BEST YOU CAN DO?

[Jace]

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1419

[Pianogirl]

Ok Wise asses, The joke is over!!!!


This thread is completely absurd. Anyone who would look into the ranting would laugh at these clowns. But for those who want an explanation I will clear this up.

There is NO childporn on her site! With 4 children of her own and her concern with child protection on the net, Shellee would NEVER advocate such a disgusting exploitation of innocent children!

1.There is no-one under the age of 18 on the site,
2. there are no references to children on the site or ANYTHING of that nature not in any meta data or text!.

Heres the facts for those who gave this thread even a second glance:

She has not responsible for your so called accusations breaking the law, and I find your ranting quite insulting. But, if you are bored and want to fabricate stories, send your insults my way! I have tough skin and can take childish ranting :-) You see, I am the one who put the site together.

I am fairly new to the field of web design. I got my start in print design and love the challenge of learning to apply my designs to the web. Anything to lighten the load and make my life easier as I learn the ropes is fine by me.


We are working on a lot of projects right now and to save time, some of the code did come from a FREE CSS template and a snippit of code from the original template was not yet deleted and it contained the word kids. We were working on testing the site and completing it and still had some work to do.

In terms of codelifter, Its a shared open source codes to make a designers life easier if they are not familiar with JavaScript codes. They require you to leave the codelifter copy write notice in the script but allow you to use it on any site. I am wondering how this makes anyone a thief?

The only thing we are guilty of is using the resources out there to better our site. GASP. Shame on us!


So what’s your deal wise-asses? Do u have an issue with women trying to be successful in this business or need to flex your muscles to make up for your small dicks?

You must think you are pretty funny! The only reason to attack someone in this nature is because you feel threatened. Who the hell are you anyway and why do u have a bone to pick with Shellee Hale? Do you have nothing better to do with your time but to take things out of context and start shit? Your superior attitude impresses no one!

[Sexyteaser]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

I just loaded it yesterday and am working on getting all the bugs worked out.. how did you even find it?

Did you see this.... Only one person has a vendetta against me and he is the real thief and would not be suprised if you were him.

>>>then click on viewsource in ie. scroll down passed the Codelifter theft announcement

Theft announcement? Learn how to read imbecile, read:

"">>>and theres a link to kids.

A LINK TO KIDS? WHERE IS THERE A LINK TOP KIDS!!!!!!!!!!!??????????????

right now it looks just like a placeholder or sum shit but fucking still people you gotta be careful these days i mean fuck! anyway its just another link >>>site to the same old shit we have all seen already so who cares. ha ha, owned.


Pathetic posting for someone who is claiming expertise... Once again what did I steal? Every accusation you made was false and deceptive - my question is what is your point or motive - unless you are **** ****** or **** *****?

[Jace]

Originally Posted by Pianogirl

Ok Wise asses, The joke is over!!!!


This thread is completely absurd. Anyone who would look into the ranting would laugh at these clowns. But for those who want an explanation I will clear this up.

There is NO childporn on her site! With 4 children of her own and her concern with child protection on the net, Shellee would NEVER advocate such a disgusting exploitation of innocent children!

1.There is no-one under the age of 18 on the site,
2. there are no references to children on the site or ANYTHING of that nature not in any meta data or text!.

Heres the facts for those who gave this thread even a second glance:

She has not responsible for your so called accusations breaking the law, and I find your ranting quite insulting. But, if you are bored and want to fabricate stories, send your insults my way! I have tough skin and can take childish ranting :-) You see, I am the one who put the site together.

I am fairly new to the field of web design. I got my start in print design and love the challenge of learning to apply my designs to the web. Anything to lighten the load and make my life easier as I learn the ropes is fine by me.


We are working on a lot of projects right now and to save time, some of the code did come from a FREE CSS template and a snippit of code from the original template was not yet deleted and it contained the word kids. We were working on testing the site and completing it and still had some work to do.

In terms of codelifter, Its a shared open source codes to make a designers life easier if they are not familiar with JavaScript codes. They require you to leave the codelifter copy write notice in the script but allow you to use it on any site. I am wondering how this makes anyone a thief?

The only thing we are guilty of is using the resources out there to better our site. GASP. Shame on us!


So what’s your deal wise-asses? Do u have an issue with women trying to be successful in this business or need to flex your muscles to make up for your small dicks?

You must think you are pretty funny! The only reason to attack someone in this nature is because you feel threatened. Who the hell are you anyway and why do u have a bone to pick with Shellee Hale? Do you have nothing better to do with your time but to take things out of context and start shit? Your superior attitude impresses no one!

oprano is the new gfy, only with a bunch of fat old farts

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Shelleehale

A LINK TO KIDS? WHERE IS THERE A LINK TOP KIDS!!!!!!!!!!!??????????????

I know that is not directed at me but, at line 112 you do have an href that is labeled as kids. The style sheet makes it not show, however, searchengines will see it.

      

        

          
Women
          
Kids
          
Men
        
      

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Pianogirl

2. there are no references to children on the site or ANYTHING of that nature not in any meta data or text!.

Yes, there is. As I pointed out. Line 112. An Href with the text kids in it

I am fairly new to the field of web design. I got my start in print design and love the challenge of learning to apply my designs to the web. Anything to lighten the load and make my life easier as I learn the ropes is fine by me

Doesn't matter. At any adult board, if folks saw that code, they would not cut you any slack on it. Whether a newbie mistake or an experienced scammer, the link would bring ire down on you.

We are working on a lot of projects right now and to save time, some of the code did come from a FREE CSS template and a snippit of code from the original template was not yet deleted and it contained the word kids. We were working on testing the site and completing it and still had some work to do.

And 5 hours after someone posted about it, and 2.5 hours after you saw it, it is still there. That is unacceptable. Doesn't matter if you are working on it or not. If we can get to the site, then the SEs can get to the site. Once you knew about it it should have been top priority in getting it out of there.

.

[gonzo]

MArk Prince...I thought you left here becasue you were unwanted.

I think your a real candy ass hiding behind a fake nick showing the real pussy you are. You want to go after someone have the balls to do it under your real id.

soundslikebullshit tripped AE detector
soundslikebullshit seems to have multiple personalities using 2MuchMark and soundslikebullshit sharing the same computer.

This aint GFY...boy.

Originally Posted by soundslikebullshit

hahaha at first i thought it was made with frontpage but if you do a view source of the index page I get this

// (C) 2000 www.CodeLifter.com
// http://www.codelifter.com

and if you go to codelifter.com you see this

CodeLifter 5.0 is a source code viewer used to see
code on http:// html pages, including pages
blocked under no-right-click scripts, trapped in
windows without file menus or url boxes, and
'referrer' pages that cannot be seen in the browser.
Also see style .css and JavaScript .js files, etc. CodeLifter is ideal for viewing, studying, and copying http:// page and file code.

so great another thief in the adult world. i doubt you are ex microshaft. more like just another big talker. oh well. next time you steal shit you should remove the evidence before you start spamming yer shit

[soundslikebullshit]

like i said in a previous post i said it looks just like the webmaster forgot to remove some code with adult you need to keep far away from words like kids that is all peace.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by soundslikebullshit

like i said in a previous post i said it looks just like the webmaster forgot to remove some code with adult you need to keep far away from words like kids that is all peace.

Why do you keep hiding behind this sock puppet Mark Prince?

Are you so small of a man that you cant bully someone with your own name?

[gonzo]

Where did you go Mark Prince?

You were liberally running that cocksucker of yours when you could hide like a little girl but play like the big bully.

Did you have to go lay off a few more people?

[2MuchMark]

Hello Everyone,

Nice try, Gonzo. I am not “soundslikebullshit”. I was about to blast you big time but now that I think of it I have a pretty good idea of who it is. We sold or gave away a bunch of old computers at our office and replaced them with shiny new ones (I have a brand new Core2 – woohoo!). All of our computers have “2Much” and other info in the Workgroup / Domain network settings. And as anyone who knows me can tell you, I ALWAYS use my real name on all forums either as my username, or as my signature. Anyone can bully behind a pseudonym.

Soundslikebullshit: If you are who I think you are, please take our name out of your workgroup settings. I don’t care what you do or where you post but I would appreciate it if this kind of thing not to be associated in any way with 2Much, thanks.

And besides Soundslikebullshit, you are wrong. I just took a look at Shelle’s site and the Codelifter code is a simple script to let people bookmark her page. You may want to read the the entire script next time before you make an ass of yourself. Here it is:




All it does is create a bookmark for the user, and nothing else. No theft going on here sorry.

Shelleehale: I applaud you on your efforts to keep trying new things, but Mr Bullshit here is right about one thing. The word “kids” anywhere in your page is a huge mistake. Even if it links to nothing, crawlers will find it. If you ever decided to add billing to your site with CCBill for example, they would find this link and refuse your account.

Anyway if I were you Shellee, I would also drop the “Teen” stuff. Not technically illegal, but some companies avoid the teen market and those who promote this niche. Some of the companies that we work with also do not like the word “Lolita”. Technically and legally it has nothing to do with “Teens”, but the famous book written by author Vladimir Nabokov still makes some people nervous I guess.

Regards,

Mark Prince
http://www.2Much.net

[ScottMcGowan]

Okay, let me wade through the bullshit a bit here.

Shelee & Pianogirl: You guys made a boo-boo, simply put. While there's nothing wrong with using free code, etc., it is indeed your responsibility to diligently check said code and make sure there's nothing undesirable contained in it. That being said, any reference to children in any way, shape, or form is a big party foul on an adult site. It doesn't matter if it's not displayed on the page itself and you have to go digging into the source code to find it. Like it was mentioned above, the search engines can still see it even if an end user can't. Soft launch or not, it's there, it can be seen, so you have to treat it as an end product.

Furthermore, after at least 10 some odd hours of being aware of this issue, neither of you have made the effort to change it. I only know this cause I went to view the source code not 10 minutes ago.

As an observer, this kind of thing doesn't bode well considering the topic of your other site, pornafia.com. Whether you actually are a hypocrite or not (and I have no reason to believe you are. It looks like you've just made a careless mistake and are too slow to correct it), it makes you look like a hypocrite.

Mark Prince, 2MuchMark, soundslikebullshit, or whatever the fuck your name is: It's obvious to everyone here that you're not interested in helping. If you were interested in actually pointing out a serious problem in an effort to get it changed you would have approached the topic in a much different way. Instead, it's obvious that you have something else in mind entirely. Folks like you exist in all realms of the adult industry and that's one of the reasons we have a hard time being taken seriously outside of the business.

Whatever you have against Shellee, take it offline. As Gonzo, said, this ain't GFY.

-Scott McGowan

[gonzo]

Did it take you an hour to come up with that lame assed excuse?

The plug in tracks your mac address not your workgroup name.

No only are you a pussy but your a fucking liar too!

And dont tell everyone you havent been logging in here so it couldnt have been tracked. I know for a fact that you have been logging into that "damned Oprano".

How else would you have congradulated my coworkers on how they were handling our buddy Rcourt?

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Hello Everyone,

Nice try, Gonzo. I am not “soundslikebullshit”. I was about to blast you big time but now that I think of it I have a pretty good idea of who it is. We sold or gave away a bunch of old computers at our office and replaced them with shiny new ones (I have a brand new Core2 – woohoo!). All of our computers have “2Much” and other info in the Workgroup / Domain network settings. And as anyone who knows me can tell you, I ALWAYS use my real name on all forums either as my username, or as my signature. Anyone can bully behind a pseudonym.

Soundslikebullshit: If you are who I think you are, please take our name out of your workgroup settings. I don’t care what you do or where you post but I would appreciate it if this kind of thing not to be associated in any way with 2Much, thanks.

And besides Soundslikebullshit, you are wrong. I just took a look at Shelle’s site and the Codelifter code is a simple script to let people bookmark her page. You may want to read the the entire script next time before you make an ass of yourself. Here it is:




All it does is create a bookmark for the user, and nothing else. No theft going on here sorry.

Shelleehale: I applaud you on your efforts to keep trying new things, but Mr Bullshit here is right about one thing. The word “kids” anywhere in your page is a huge mistake. Even if it links to nothing, crawlers will find it. If you ever decided to add billing to your site with CCBill for example, they would find this link and refuse your account.

Anyway if I were you Shellee, I would also drop the “Teen” stuff. Not technically illegal, but some companies avoid the teen market and those who promote this niche. Some of the companies that we work with also do not like the word “Lolita”. Technically and legally it has nothing to do with “Teens”, but the famous book written by author Vladimir Nabokov still makes some people nervous I guess.

Regards,

Mark Prince
http://www.2Much.net

[2MuchMark]

Hello again,

Believe anything you like, Gonzo. I have no interest in trying to change your mind about anything at all.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Hello again,

Believe anything you like, Gonzo. I have no interest in trying to change your mind about anything at all.

Why would anyone want to send their traffic to a program owner who is a liar and bullies women while he hides behind a sock puppet?

Tell me how far of a leap is it to go from liar to thief?

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by gonzo

The plug in tracks your mac address not your workgroup name.

No only are you a pussy but your a fucking liar too!

Actually Gonzo, you're wrong (and quite possibly a liar). MAC addresses are the unique addresses of any Network card in any pc, and are not transmitted in TCP/IP packets off of the local network to the Internet. You cannot obtain the MAC Address of a PC on the Internet unless that PC was running an application that would first obtain the mac address, and then publish it somehow. At any rate, you may want to re-read what I said earlier.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Why would anyone want to send their traffic to a program owner who is a liar and bullies women while he hides behind a sock puppet?

Tell me how far of a leap is it to go from liar to thief?

I know! It must sure seem like a big mystery to you! Don't work too hard trying to figure this one out.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Actually Gonzo, you're wrong (and quite possibly a liar). MAC addresses are the unique addresses of any Network card in any pc, and are not transmitted in TCP/IP packets off of the local network to the Internet. You cannot obtain the MAC Address of a PC on the Internet unless that PC was running an application that would first obtain the mac address, and then publish it somehow. At any rate, you may want to re-read what I said earlier.

Yeah everyone is wrong except for you Mark.

I guess now your going to tell me how probable it is that both IDs are in montreal as well.

You have a history of this shit with Shellee and I dont care either way. When you want to hide behind a sock puppet is when I do have a problem.

Take that shit to GFY. I wont have it here.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

I know! It must sure seem like a big mystery to you! Don't work too hard trying to figure this one out.

Im working on the next Playboy mansion party scam.

Im going buy a table for $1000 a seat and offer each of my affilaites the chance of a life time to sit with me at the same table for the price of $2000 a seat.

Did that work out pretty good when you did it?

[Hammer]

Well said ScottMcGowan. I don't care who the fake asshole is and I'm not interested in watching yet another Shellee Hale/Mark Prince shitfest, but the fact that after the references to children in the code was pointed out and yet Shellee chose to defend the reason it was there instead of thanking the person for pointing it out and removing it immediately, is disturbing. And I don't give a rat's ass how many kids she has, this is the kind of shit that can fuck our industry in the ass.

In case I wasn't clear Shellee. GET THE FUCKING SHIT OFF THE SITE NOW OR TAKE THE SITE DOWN UNTIL IT IS!

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Yeah everyone is wrong except for you Mark.

I guess now your going to tell me how probable it is that both IDs are in montreal as well.

You have a history of this shit with Shellee and I dont care either way. When you want to hide behind a sock puppet is when I do have a problem.

Take that shit to GFY. I wont have it here.

Gonzo,
Our office is located in Monteral, Canada. The computers went to locals as I said earlier. No mystery there.

Shellee and I stopped doing business together months ago but it does not mean that I do not wish her well. You are the one who seems to want to stir stuff up.

You may want to stop the the "take it to GFY" thing. You only wish you had their popularity. You know as well as everyone else that a little drama here and there is good for any site because it attracts hits and therefore more banner impressions for you to brag to your advertisers about.

Anyway I have said my bit. I have emailed the person who I suspect needs to change their workgroup / domain (with a little Smarten-up message for good measure). I wish everyone a very nice day.

[Sexyteaser]

Originally Posted by ScottMcGowan

Okay, let me wade through the bullshit a bit here.

Shelee & Pianogirl: You guys made a boo-boo, simply put. While there's nothing wrong with using free code, etc., it is indeed your responsibility to diligently check said code and make sure there's nothing undesirable contained in it. That being said, any reference to children in any way, shape, or form is a big party foul on an adult site. It doesn't matter if it's not displayed on the page itself and you have to go digging into the source code to find it. Like it was mentioned above, the search engines can still see it even if an end user can't. Soft launch or not, it's there, it can be seen, so you have to treat it as an end product.

Furthermore, after at least 10 some odd hours of being aware of this issue, neither of you have made the effort to change it. I only know this cause I went to view the source code not 10 minutes ago.

As an observer, this kind of thing doesn't bode well considering the topic of your other site, pornafia.com. Whether you actually are a hypocrite or not (and I have no reason to believe you are. It looks like you've just made a careless mistake and are too slow to correct it), it makes you look like a hypocrite.

Mark Prince, 2MuchMark, soundslikebullshit, or whatever the fuck your name is: It's obvious to everyone here that you're not interested in helping. If you were interested in actually pointing out a serious problem in an effort to get it changed you would have approached the topic in a much different way. Instead, it's obvious that you have something else in mind entirely. Folks like you exist in all realms of the adult industry and that's one of the reasons we have a hard time being taken seriously outside of the business.

Whatever you have against Shellee, take it offline. As Gonzo, said, this ain't GFY.

-Scott McGowan

Scott,

We had already fixed this but I made an executive decision to leave it for now becuase of the inflamatory accusations as I don't have anything to hide nor am I involved in anything illegal or a thief. Although you may not agree with my not fixing this right away I wanted to remain transparent so it could be obvious what happened here.

In the last 9 months we have worked on over 19 sites and they aren't just porn walls. I am currently aquiring more sites and exclusive content as prices are dropping. Do any of you want to expose your first 9 months? I appreciate the help and support of 99.9% of you on here and am grateful for this experience as it has taught me a lot.

There are many people in this business making money off me with jobs, advertising and traffic and I am trying to have good products and weather the economic storm. Not one of them would say I was a thief or unethical. If anything I've been screwed a few times. Currently our sales are growing when most companies are down up to 35% or more. So, I must be doing something right.

All in all I think i will still be standing and the two bashers on here only time will tell (they don't even have reference to a site they own) but experts come in all shapes and sizes and even hide behind pseudonymn's.

Scott it is fixed.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Gonzo,
Our office is located in Monteral, Canada. The computers went to locals as I said earlier. No mystery there.

Shellee and I stopped doing business together months ago but it does not mean that I do not wish her well. You are the one who seems to want to stir stuff up.

You may want to stop the the "take it to GFY" thing. You only wish you had their popularity. You know as well as everyone else that a little drama here and there is good for any site because it attracts hits and therefore more banner impressions for you to brag to your advertisers about.

Anyway I have said my bit. I have emailed the person who I suspect needs to change their workgroup / domain (with a little Smarten-up message for good measure). I wish everyone a very nice day.

Hmmm you wish her well? How do you wish her well when you told her that you would do everything within your power to see that she didnt succeed?

Another lie.

As Ive told you on the mechanics of running this board.
I got this.
I dont need your advice.

Use that industry expert knowledge you tell your clients that you have to keep your webcam business rolling.

That way you wont have to lay off 3 more people.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Im working on the next Playboy mansion party scam.

Im going buy a table for $1000 a seat and offer each of my affilaites the chance of a life time to sit with me at the same table for the price of $2000 a seat.

Did that work out pretty good when you did it?

Actually Gonzo, since you asked.

The cost of the Playboy spnsorship was $10,000. We were going to give away a free inviations to each of our customers to purchased a license within a certain time. We also offered the chance for previous customers to buy seat at our table for $2000 each.

The cost to us for each seat was $1000 + $250.00 for the show badge which was required, leaving us an $750.00 profit. In the end we partnered with another company for the table, sold several licenses thanks to the promotion, but only a couple to previous customers. Still, it worked out very well for everyone involved.

You have to understand that to someone like you who is already in the industry, going to Playboy is a nice party. But to new people the chance to go to Playboy means much more. Not only did we offer our clients Playboy, but lots of meetings with us and lots of introductions to important people during the entire course of the trade show. We provided our clients with a great entry into the world of adult, capped off with a great night at Playboy. Pardon me Gonzo if you don't think we deserve to make a $750.00 profit for that.

Cheers!

[Hammer]

If business is so good why are you using templates, and bad ones at that?

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Actually Gonzo, since you asked.

The cost of the Playboy spnsorship was $10,000. We were going to give away a free inviations to each of our customers to purchased a license within a certain time. We also offered the chance for previous customers to buy seat at our table for $2000 each.

The cost to us for each seat was $1000 + $250.00 for the show badge which was required, leaving us an $750.00 profit. In the end we partnered with another company for the table, sold several licenses thanks to the promotion, but only a couple to previous customers. Still, it worked out very well for everyone involved.

You have to understand that to someone like you who is already in the industry, going to Playboy is a nice party. But to new people the chance to go to Playboy means much more. Not only did we offer our clients Playboy, but lots of meetings with us and lots of introductions to important people during the entire course of the trade show. We provided our clients with a great entry into the world of adult, capped off with a great night at Playboy. Pardon me Gonzo if you don't think we deserve to make a $750.00 profit for that.

Cheers!

They werent checking for show badges. Lie 3.
Tony Morgan was at that party and I know he didnt have a show badge.

A thousand dollar profit. What a nice way to reward your affiliates and licensees.

Tell me the additional 5% hold back on top of the CCBill holdback... do you consider that a reward too?