Worst Thing The Democrats Have Done?

[Almighty Colin]

What's the worst thing the Democrats have done in the past 25 years?



Last edited by Colin at Nov 5 2002, 06:33 AM

[Torone]

Breathe!!!

[Vick]

are you sure you didn't mean breed?




Couldn't help myself ... oh I did

[ulfie]

Create a class of people that are completely dependent on them assuring they will never vote for anyone else.

[Hooper]

yeah.. as a pornographer i really understand why fellow pornographers would prefer a party who is eager to become their big brother.


maybe this simple explanation would make it easier.
republlicans = lower taxes, pornographers are as bad as rapists and murderers, "dept of homeland defense", ashcroft yada yada

democrats = crazy loser liberals who believe that every crack whore should be free to drain off of all of us cause she's pregnant, no guns.. but net porn is really not a concern they have voiced.

so i guess the question is.. if a republican takes away your business and all of your money what is your income?

if a democrat raises your taxes but you get to stay in business, what is your income?


so while i can understand why MOST people would want the republican gun toting, jesus lovin christian coahlition... why would a bunch of pornographers even think that for one second that it's a GOOD thing to have conservatives in office????

[Vick]

Hooper - that's an amusing post but .......
I think conservatives in office are good for the business and for business climate in general out side of what I'm talking about here

Porn needs to be a little more tabooo and is too mainstream

Let's take it back a little towards the forbidden fruit (even though it won't go far, the toothpaste is out of the tube so to speak - and the internet had a lot to do with it)

Also we go back to the issue of one countries goverment trying to legislate a global enitity - hard to make that work

What would your worse fears be that the USA of a state goverment would do?

[Mutt]

i'm with Hooper. What pornographer in his right mind cheers on the Republican party? I can understand choosing a Republican candidate weighing all the issues that are important to you and your personal philosophy. But to be a card carrying Republican toadie and a pornographer at the same time? Ridiculous. Go to a Repubican fund raising dinner and introduce yourself "Hey, good to meet ya Bob, my name's Dave and I'm the owner of Cock Craving Teenage Whores.com"


Democrats might want to invade your wallet and waste your money, Republicans want to invade your bedroom. No politician has a right inside your bedroom, not even to peep through the keyhole.

as always, be careful what you wish for, it just may come true.

[Hooper]

---
Porn needs to be a little more tabooo and is too mainstream
---

you really think that a christian coahlition funded government is anything but incredibly frightening for porn companies???? does everybody here forget the meese era? i mean shit i was only 9 but i remember it... phone sex operators and video operators being thrown in jail.

jail is real bro.. jail is where you get fucked in the ass and get told when to piss.

the notion that a republican government is good for the adult internet strikes me as a mentality driven by a denial that what you do is considered to be morally reprehensible by the people who get to decide whether or not to prosecute you for offending their sensibilities.

in all reality our company is not a great target because we dont produce anything and keep our tours free of the no-nos..

but i am shocked even more when i see CONTENT PRODUCERS.. the ones who actually film the sexual conduct standing beind conservative values.

dont get me wrong bro.. i would LOVE lower taxes... i disagree with 99% of what the democratic party has to say.. but like my previous post said.. i would prefer to pay 35% of millions than 33.5% of NOTHING.

people who do non-adult.. i cant argue with.. but adult industry people voting for republicans baffles me.... but i'm not gonna convince anybody...

i'm just movin to the islands mon.

[ulfie]

uh huh Mutt, do the same thing at a democrat rally and see how fast you get shown the door. NEITHER party is your friend in this business. I find it laughable that people think the democrats are supportive of porn. I am NOT a one issue voter. I've never once in my life voted straight party line. But that's only because I take the time to look at the candidates records, listen to what they say, and then vote based on what I believe is the best overall candidate.

Hello guys,

this is my first post here, but I thought it was a good subject to break the ice... I agree with Hooper too about the fact that being a pornographer and a republican is a contradiction in itself. You might say there is nothing they can do to the internet porn business because they cannot rule a global entity, but they showed us they can hit pretty hard when they got their way with Visa and made them register everyone under the big IPSP's. They might not control the internet, but believe me they can still have a lot of power over financial institutions worldwide and they can make it hard for us to make cash. Of course, if they keep on going like that, you'll still be able to peddle porn if you want to, but you'll have to give it away for free. I prefer to see a democrat at the presidence and feel secure about the fact that i'll still be able to charge my members tomorrow

Of course, that's only my opinion...

[ulfie]

btw, who introduced copa, cda, cdaII, etc? Bill Clinton, that's who. Who shot them all down? A conservative supreme court. People have their eyes closed if they believe any politician is their friend.

[RawAlex]

Ulfie, it isn't about "who's a friend of porn"... it has to do with "who isn't trying to string porn people up by the balls (or other naughty bits)?".

Republicans have a specific anti-porn agenda. Democrats don't.

Vick, I agree with you, in the sense that porn is TOO available, but at the same time, I am not planning to go to jail to keep it "special". Taking it up the ass, literally, for the cause isn't in my plans.

Democrat and Republicans are in for a big surprise when someone finally gets the middle ground right and puts forth a third party that represents the views of the people, not the 5% whackos at each end of the scale.

Alex

[PornoDoggy]

Ulfie, read my lips.

It's the judges, stupid!!!

That's what makes this election so critical. You've got a born-again at justice, a born-again in the White House who put him there, and now, probably/possibly, a Senate that will rubber stamp his judical appointees because a good many of them are beholden to them as well. Most of their previous attempts have fallen apart in the courts. That may soon change, and that ain't good.



Last edited by PornoDoggy at Nov 6 2002, 12:41 AM

[ulfie]

Republicans have a specific anti-porn agenda. Democrats don't.
********************
See my previous post....

Arguing this is futile since no one is going to change anyone elses mind. Let's just argree to disagree.

[PornoDoggy]

Originally posted by ulfie@Nov 6 2002, 12:33 AM
btw, who introduced copa, cda, cdaII, etc? Bill Clinton, that's who. Who shot them all down? A conservative supreme court. People have their eyes closed if they believe any politician is their friend.

Are you sure it wasn't the Republican Congress who initiated and passed them? I kinda think that's how laws get passed. Clinton did sign them, I'm not disputing that - but I don't think he initiated them.

I am a Republican who voted for Ralph Nader !!!!

[ulfie]

Originally posted by PornoDoggy+Nov 6 2002, 12:42 AM-->