Oprano Front Page


Go Back   Oprano Adult Industry Forums > The Business Of Porn - Closed For Posting > Legacy Archived Main Board

Notices

Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.





Check Out YnotMail

The Original Oprano Flat Board (Thanks To Sarettah!)---
Oprano Swag Shop
"History Of Porn Timeline
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2010   #1
pornlaw
Future BROmaster
 
pornlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 266
Default Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2muchmark2 View Post
I have a couple of questions regarding 2257, minors, and movies.

In any photo shoot or movie shoot, you as the producer obtain photo ID from all of the actors in the shoot. If the face and body are mostly hidden from the camera during a shoot (as they would be in Dirty D's Glory Hole stuff, how is the 2257 ID tied to the actors? After all, it could be anyones penis sticking through.
As the producer you better be able to prove whom the actor in the video is. When there are scenes shot without faces I always instruct my clients to film some BTS footage than can be used to tie the two together. The burden of proof is on the producer.

Quote:
Here's another: In a movie or scene with 2 or more actors, wouldn't the 2257 or Proof of Age documentation be required to be presented (and maybe signed off on) from every actor, to every other actor. in a scene? If not, how would any actor know if his or her fellow actors are adults?
Interesting but not really relevant. I have never seen an actor charged with having sex with a minor in a case where there is an underage performer. Perhaps but unlikely.

I expect Dirty Ds situation to grow worse and LE will probably be going through all of his docs looking for other underage performers. I would also expect them to call some of the ones that are borderline and even run some of the IDs to see if they are fake.

It might even go as far as 2257 and the FBI but we will have to wait and see. In the Ray Guhn case in Florida, the DA added charges as the investigation continued.

It could even impact the affiliates - just as it reached down to the distributors in the Traci Lord case.
__________________
Michael

pornlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010   #2
gonzo
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
gonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Atlanta,Ga.
Posts: 17,795
Blog Entries: 11
Default Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD

Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post
As the producer you better be able to prove whom the actor in the video is. When there are scenes shot without faces I always instruct my clients to film some BTS footage than can be used to tie the two together. The burden of proof is on the producer.



Interesting but not really relevant. I have never seen an actor charged with having sex with a minor in a case where there is an underage performer. Perhaps but unlikely.

I expect Dirty Ds situation to grow worse and LE will probably be going through all of his docs looking for other underage performers. I would also expect them to call some of the ones that are borderline and even run some of the IDs to see if they are fake.

It might even go as far as 2257 and the FBI but we will have to wait and see. In the Ray Guhn case in Florida, the DA added charges as the investigation continued.

It could even impact the affiliates - just as it reached down to the distributors in the Traci Lord case.
Damn. PULL THEM LINKS!
__________________
We are putting the bastards of this world on notice; greed and corruption will always be met with "a voice made of ink and rage."
"Never try and be like anyone else" - Hunter S. Thompson
"The truth is the truth no matter how you try and package a lie" - Shellee Hale
gonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010   #3
Hell Puppy
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
Hell Puppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,523
Default Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD

We always run at least one "security cam" during a shoot. It's just an extra video camera static on a tripod stashed in the corner out of the way with a wide shot of the room and performance. That tape gets stored with the original raw footage and pics of the shoot including the 2257 docs. It also has the footage of the model presenting the ID and signing release.

If there's ever a question about exactly what happened or was said at a shoot, we've got it on tape.
Hell Puppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010   #4
pornlaw
Future BROmaster
 
pornlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 266
Default Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hell Puppy View Post
We always run at least one "security cam" during a shoot. It's just an extra video camera static on a tripod stashed in the corner out of the way with a wide shot of the room and performance. That tape gets stored with the original raw footage and pics of the shoot including the 2257 docs. It also has the footage of the model presenting the ID and signing release.

If there's ever a question about exactly what happened or was said at a shoot, we've got it on tape.
I would recommend keeping a copy of all of this in a safety deposit box as well. Once LE comes in with a search warrant those tapes and everything else will be carted off.

This is one way www.2257Safe.com can really help. Its off site storage of your records that can be accessed by anyone anywhere with a password.

If LE comes in and confiscates all records including 2257 records you will have to fight to get them back. And if you're arrested you will have a harder time than just getting them back.

With a mere password you can give your lawyer access to the records so as to help defend you. Dirty D is in Spain and has no way to getting to his records and he even admitted they are probably already gone.

You can have all the proof you want but once LE takes it, it is out of your control and if something is "lost" the burden remains on you to prove it existed. At least always have back up storage of everything off site and off your servers in case those are also confiscated.
__________________
Michael

pornlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010   #5
Hell Puppy
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
Hell Puppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,523
Default Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD

Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post
I would recommend keeping a copy of all of this in a safety deposit box as well. Once LE comes in with a search warrant those tapes and everything else will be carted off.

This is one way www.2257Safe.com can really help. Its off site storage of your records that can be accessed by anyone anywhere with a password.

If LE comes in and confiscates all records including 2257 records you will have to fight to get them back. And if you're arrested you will have a harder time than just getting them back.

With a mere password you can give your lawyer access to the records so as to help defend you. Dirty D is in Spain and has no way to getting to his records and he even admitted they are probably already gone.

You can have all the proof you want but once LE takes it, it is out of your control and if something is "lost" the burden remains on you to prove it existed. At least always have back up storage of everything off site and off your servers in case those are also confiscated.
Good advice.

Everything important exists in at least 2 physical locations. Never really thought so much about a LE seizure as the reason, but more so fire or natural disaster.
Hell Puppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010   #6
EmporerEJ
Brilliant Innoventionalist and writer.
 
EmporerEJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA, Northern Hemisphere, Terra, 3rd of nine, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Far from Galactic Core
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: Legal Questions regarding 2257 and how it pertains to DirtyD

Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post

It could even impact the affiliates - just as it reached down to the distributors in the Traci Lord case.
Don't forget the retailers.....

It reached the retailers. I was one of them at the time.
__________________

Eric J. White
VirtualSexMachine.com
EmporerEJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 AM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022