![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Master of My Domains
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,701
|
If the photos of the minor are obviously displayed to appeal to prurient interests, I'm pretty sure it will qualify as CP and based on the descriptions I doubt they were innocent photos of a nude girl but rather the girl posing provocatively for her boyfriend.
__________________
Porn Site Pros - Custom Website Design, Turnkey Webcam and Pay Sites, SEO, and Consulting |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
|
so you are agreeing with me on the subjectivity of the porn or art debate. Hammer, a 17 year old kid with pics of a 16 year old is hardly grounds for a kiddy porn charge. Only in America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Stay Out Of The Box
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lost in the ozone
Posts: 10,318
|
Seems to me they need to charge her with something for producing cp if they are going to hit him with possession.
Only fair. Such bullshit. Yeah, he was an idiot to put them up there. An idiot to wise off to the cops. But I don't think he was a felonys worth of an idiot.
__________________
![]() Free Adult Webcams |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| myspace |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|