![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
|
Gotta side with Joe on this one. No judge should preside over a trial that is brought to his or her court by their former law partner. That's a HUGE conflict of interest. If he's guilty he should lose the suit but he also deserves a fair trial and getting fair rulings from a judge who was partners with the opposing attorney sure doesn't seem likely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
|
I have to say that it sounds more like Joe Francis trying to deflect from the real issue, that there may be significant numbers of underage performers on video, or at least who have been approached to "appear" in the GGW videos.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Future BROmaster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 266
|
Conflict on the Judges part however, he doesnt have to recuse himself. Though, it may give Francis a solid reason to appeal. It depends on how the Judge handles himself during trial.
But I suspect no one would really care for Francis, no matter who presided over the trial. Michael www.AdultBizLaw.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Members
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 926
|
There are so many girl who would do ggw that are overage its so dumb.
__________________
www.creamycandy.com yum yum. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|