Shelleehale your site is screwed up in IE6

[soundslikebullshit]

it really does. kiddie porn is fucking sad and anyone who even jokes about it is a sick fuck. to be fair to the webmaster it just looks like he stole the code and called it his own but didn't look at it closely enough. theif? pedophile? both be twisted. any lawyers reading this :: what happens if you accidentally have this shit on your site?

[soundslikebullshit]

yo i just read more about codelifter. its free to download or they sell you a license for $20 or so but its truly for lazy mofos coz the code if gives you you could learn yourself easy. and even if youre a complete dumbass you still cant copy and run that code without knowing other things such as file permissions if the code was in perl for example. anyway shelleehale dont steal it makes baby jesus cry

[softball]

wow, you guys are talking freeking Swahili or something. I have no idea what all this shit means.

[Sexyteaser]

>>>hahaha at first i thought it was made with frontpage but if you do a view source of the index page I get this

>>>// (C) 2000 www.CodeLifter.com
>>>// http://www.codelifter.com

What you are making reference to here is part of the free "Bookmark Us" script that the web designer used. But you know this. It is Obvious from looking at the code. Anyone reading this thread can go there and look for themselves and see that you are just being a malicious pathetic asshole . . .

>>>and if you go to codelifter.com you see this

>>>CodeLifter 5.0 is a source code viewer used to see
>>>code on http:// html pages, including pages
>>>blocked under no-right-click scripts, trapped in
>>>windows without file menus or url boxes, and
>>>'referrer' pages that cannot be seen in the browser.
>>>Also see style .css and JavaScript .js files, etc. CodeLifter is ideal for viewing, studying, and copying http:// page and file code.

And you will also see several other tools on there, not just that one, but once again you know this, as it is obvious from reading the codelifter website . . . once again, anyone with half a brain can see that for his or herself by going to the site and reading about the tools on offer there.

>>>so great another thief in the adult world. i doubt you are ex microshaft. more like just another big talker. oh well. next time you >>>steal shit you should remove the evidence before you start spamming yer shit

What a pathetic, sorry little POS . . . insulting the intelligence of the ENTIRE board, as if people could not see for themselves that you are maliciously taking that markup out of context . . . how PATHETIC . . . is this the best you can do? You are truly laughable . . .

[Sexyteaser]

>>>wow there is worse shit in there.

>>> a href="http://www.freewebsitetemplates.com">Kidshttp://www.freewebsitetemplates.com">Kids
>>>

>>> kids? kids? lady wtd what are you promoting anyway ??? teens is bad enuf clean yer code!

Low blow, and you know it, you pathetic little F Authority slime, how DARE you bring that into this, damn well knowing - AS IT IS OBVIOUS FROM READING THE CODE - that what happened was that a FREE TEMPLATE was used by a web designer, who inadvertently left a FEW SNIPPETS OF CODE in the new website, snippets that don't even show on the interpreted version of the website. The template used was:

http://www.freewebsitetemplates.com/preview/fashionhut/

Pathetic . . . once again, IS THIS THE BEST YOU CAN DO?

[Pianogirl]

Ok Wise asses, The joke is over!!!!


This thread is completely absurd. Anyone who would look into the ranting would laugh at these clowns. But for those who want an explanation I will clear this up.

There is NO childporn on her site! With 4 children of her own and her concern with child protection on the net, Shellee would NEVER advocate such a disgusting exploitation of innocent children!

1.There is no-one under the age of 18 on the site,
2. there are no references to children on the site or ANYTHING of that nature not in any meta data or text!.

Heres the facts for those who gave this thread even a second glance:

She has not responsible for your so called accusations breaking the law, and I find your ranting quite insulting. But, if you are bored and want to fabricate stories, send your insults my way! I have tough skin and can take childish ranting :-) You see, I am the one who put the site together.

I am fairly new to the field of web design. I got my start in print design and love the challenge of learning to apply my designs to the web. Anything to lighten the load and make my life easier as I learn the ropes is fine by me.


We are working on a lot of projects right now and to save time, some of the code did come from a FREE CSS template and a snippit of code from the original template was not yet deleted and it contained the word kids. We were working on testing the site and completing it and still had some work to do.

In terms of codelifter, Its a shared open source codes to make a designers life easier if they are not familiar with JavaScript codes. They require you to leave the codelifter copy write notice in the script but allow you to use it on any site. I am wondering how this makes anyone a thief?

The only thing we are guilty of is using the resources out there to better our site. GASP. Shame on us!


So what’s your deal wise-asses? Do u have an issue with women trying to be successful in this business or need to flex your muscles to make up for your small dicks?

You must think you are pretty funny! The only reason to attack someone in this nature is because you feel threatened. Who the hell are you anyway and why do u have a bone to pick with Shellee Hale? Do you have nothing better to do with your time but to take things out of context and start shit? Your superior attitude impresses no one!

[Jace]

Originally Posted by Pianogirl

Ok Wise asses, The joke is over!!!!


This thread is completely absurd. Anyone who would look into the ranting would laugh at these clowns. But for those who want an explanation I will clear this up.

There is NO childporn on her site! With 4 children of her own and her concern with child protection on the net, Shellee would NEVER advocate such a disgusting exploitation of innocent children!

1.There is no-one under the age of 18 on the site,
2. there are no references to children on the site or ANYTHING of that nature not in any meta data or text!.

Heres the facts for those who gave this thread even a second glance:

She has not responsible for your so called accusations breaking the law, and I find your ranting quite insulting. But, if you are bored and want to fabricate stories, send your insults my way! I have tough skin and can take childish ranting :-) You see, I am the one who put the site together.

I am fairly new to the field of web design. I got my start in print design and love the challenge of learning to apply my designs to the web. Anything to lighten the load and make my life easier as I learn the ropes is fine by me.


We are working on a lot of projects right now and to save time, some of the code did come from a FREE CSS template and a snippit of code from the original template was not yet deleted and it contained the word kids. We were working on testing the site and completing it and still had some work to do.

In terms of codelifter, Its a shared open source codes to make a designers life easier if they are not familiar with JavaScript codes. They require you to leave the codelifter copy write notice in the script but allow you to use it on any site. I am wondering how this makes anyone a thief?

The only thing we are guilty of is using the resources out there to better our site. GASP. Shame on us!


So what’s your deal wise-asses? Do u have an issue with women trying to be successful in this business or need to flex your muscles to make up for your small dicks?

You must think you are pretty funny! The only reason to attack someone in this nature is because you feel threatened. Who the hell are you anyway and why do u have a bone to pick with Shellee Hale? Do you have nothing better to do with your time but to take things out of context and start shit? Your superior attitude impresses no one!

oprano is the new gfy, only with a bunch of fat old farts

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Pianogirl

2. there are no references to children on the site or ANYTHING of that nature not in any meta data or text!.

Yes, there is. As I pointed out. Line 112. An Href with the text kids in it

I am fairly new to the field of web design. I got my start in print design and love the challenge of learning to apply my designs to the web. Anything to lighten the load and make my life easier as I learn the ropes is fine by me

Doesn't matter. At any adult board, if folks saw that code, they would not cut you any slack on it. Whether a newbie mistake or an experienced scammer, the link would bring ire down on you.

We are working on a lot of projects right now and to save time, some of the code did come from a FREE CSS template and a snippit of code from the original template was not yet deleted and it contained the word kids. We were working on testing the site and completing it and still had some work to do.

And 5 hours after someone posted about it, and 2.5 hours after you saw it, it is still there. That is unacceptable. Doesn't matter if you are working on it or not. If we can get to the site, then the SEs can get to the site. Once you knew about it it should have been top priority in getting it out of there.

.