Question for the lawyers - 2257 and nude "Art"

[RawAlex]

Originally Posted by pornlaw

Not quite. Alex makes a lot of great points. I think we differ in so much that, while I have not reviewed the site, it might be exempt. Jeff is a strong attorney and well versed in 2257. He is not careless and would not put up that statement unless his decision was well supported.

Michael

http://www.adultbizlaw.com

Would it not also be important to know when those statements were made? If I remember correctly, that quote has been on their site since about 1999. With all the changes, challenges, and rulings made since then, would it not be something that would need to be re-examined from time to time?