Is innovation in adult dead? And why?

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Rcourt64

It's not about inventing anything sherlock shit head

I have an orange. I didn't invent it.

I have a strainer. I didn't invent that either


but I created this:


And I'm making millions with it.

It's not about inventing anything, it's cause you all sit inside the Internet Box and think your answers lay within. and they don't.

Why is it that when I speak to you rhetorical, I feel like I'm back in Kinder garden

Ah, here my Tampa friend I dsagree with you.

A creation is an invention.

An invention does not have to be totally new, it can be a recombining of exisitng things in a new way that produces a new product.

In your example with the Orange and a strainer you have not invented a new product, after all Orange Juice has been around since the first Orange. However, you have created a new method for getting at the Orange Juice, no longer do I have to peel the Orange and get rid of the crap to get at the juice, now it can be packaged in a glass, a bottle or any other type of container. So while the parts you used were not new and in reality the product produced was not new the combination of the parts to produce the product (Orange Juice without the Orange) is new. The methodology you used is the invention.

[JoesHO]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Ah, here my Tampa friend I dsagree with you.

A creation is an invention.

An invention does not have to be totally new, it can be a recombining of exisitng things in a new way that produces a new product.

In your example with the Orange and a strainer you have not invented a new product, after all Orange Juice has been around since the first Orange. However, you have created a new method for getting at the Orange Juice, no longer do I have to peel the Orange and get rid of the crap to get at the juice, now it can be packaged in a glass, a bottle or any other type of container. So while the parts you used were not new and in reality the product produced was not new the combination of the parts to produce the product (Orange Juice without the Orange) is new. The methodology you used is the invention.

it is a service offred, he gets the juice and sllls the juice, nothing inovative at all.

he fills a need . supply and demand simple economics 101 . he finds a demand for oj and gives them oj.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by JoesHO

it is a service offred, he gets the juice and sllls the juice, nothing inovative at all.

he fills a need . supply and demand simple economics 101 . he finds a demand for oj and gives them oj.

If it is new (as in his example the producing of the Orange Juice is new) then it is most definitely innovation.

Innovation can be a new product, a new method, a new sales approach, anything that inroduces a new component to the mix is an innovation.

[softball]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Ah, here my Tampa friend I dsagree with you.

A creation is an invention.

An invention does not have to be totally new, it can be a recombining of exisitng things in a new way that produces a new product.

In your example with the Orange and a strainer you have not invented a new product, after all Orange Juice has been around since the first Orange. However, you have created a new method for getting at the Orange Juice, no longer do I have to peel the Orange and get rid of the crap to get at the juice, now it can be packaged in a glass, a bottle or any other type of container. So while the parts you used were not new and in reality the product produced was not new the combination of the parts to produce the product (Orange Juice without the Orange) is new. The methodology you used is the invention.

There are a lot of inventions to getting orange juice into the box and onto your table....not the least of which is the box...the materials created and the processes to make the box. The hundreds of patents to make sure the juice is safe to drink. The thousands of patents involved in growing the oranges in sufficient quantity to produce juice at a commercial level. The hundreds of thousands of patents involved in constructing the roads and manufacturing the cars and metal to transport the juice. Hell, all inventions rely on previous invention. I wonder what the first invention was. It would surely be the only pure invention. I guess Rcourt never got out of kinder garden because he can't even spell it. BTW, that is the great thing about adult. You can be a moron and still make a living. It is kind of an equal opportunity industry. Of that we should be proud.

[Hammer]

There's a big difference between innovating and inventing. There are still new inventions coming out daily, but most of them are based on previous inventions. In our business we don't need to invent anything, but being able to innovate sure helps.

[Rcourt64]

Originally Posted by rhetorical

I guess Rcourt never got out of kinder garden because he can't even spell it.

HAHAHAHA!!! Sherlock shit head took the bait
Someone owns me 20 bucks. I told you he didn't block me

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Rcourt64

HAHAHAHA!!! Sherlock shit head took the bait
Someone owns me 20 bucks. I told you he didn't block me

Now thats pretty funny.

[softball]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Now thats pretty funny.

Yeah, its pretty funny since I saw it in a quote. I wondered how long it would take you to dance R. You been punked. Now say your sorry and get someone to quote it. OMG that was truly funny. Can you spell Newbie?

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by rhetorical

Yeah, its pretty funny since I saw it in a quote. I wondered how long it would take you to dance R. You been punked. Now say your sorry and get someone to quote it. OMG that was truly funny. Can you spell Newbie?

Nah, what's funny (since you seem to need these things explained to you on a perpetual basis) is that you said you had him on ignore.

He nailed you on that one, whether purposely or as an unexpected side effect I could not say.


And it is funny

[softball]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Nah, what's funny (since you seem to need these things explained to you on a perpetual basis) is that you said you had him on ignore.

He nailed you on that one, whether purposely or as an unexpected side effect I could not say.


And it is funny

I do and what exactly is your point?