Religious bannings on the adult web forums

[Hammer]

Banning Crissy from MP was ridiculous.

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Hammer

Banning Crissy from MP was ridiculous.

That's why they wager on horse races, differences in opinion.

[tony404]

I dont understand they left the business then why keep posting on the boards. I asked on multiple donny threads why is he posting and not at work but he ignored me. He said he got a job why isnt he at work, he has a kid to take care of. No answer.

[Hammer]

Originally Posted by tony404

I dont understand they left the business then why keep posting on the boards. I asked on multiple donny threads why is he posting and not at work but he ignored me. He said he got a job why isnt he at work, he has a kid to take care of. No answer.

I think it's hilarious how we are always shouting about free speech and how the government has no right to tell us what to think and do and how the FCC sucks because they dictate what we can listen to on the radio and watch on TV and yet at the same time, some of you then turn around and condone banning someone because you don't like what they say on a message board.

If you don't like what's on TV, turn it off. If you don't like what's on the radio, turn it off. If you don't like what someone says on a message board, turn them off and put them on ignore.

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Hammer

...condone banning someone because you don't like what they say on a message board.

In Crissy's case I think it had far more to do with avoiding a heated public discourse between Crissy and Kevin than about what Crissy was posting. Emotions were high, and some cooling off needed to happen. I think it was a prudent move as it probably prevented a nasty exchange that would have done no one any good.

[Jace]

I think Jack said it best

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

I thought about this a little bit. There's a kind of censorship that wants to shut something up. Then there's another kind of censorship that wants to shut up the things that want other things to be shut up. I don't see the 2nd kind as censorship at all. In my mind, that's the necessary POLICING OF FREE SPEECH -- :2 cents:

[Hammer]

Originally Posted by Toby

In Crissy's case I think it had far more to do with avoiding a heated public discourse between Crissy and Kevin than about what Crissy was posting. Emotions were high, and some cooling off needed to happen. I think it was a prudent move as it probably prevented a nasty exchange that would have done no one any good.

It would have done me some good. I was looking forward to it, but no, Kevin had to go and take my fun away.

[LadyMischief]

Originally Posted by Toby

In Crissy's case I think it had far more to do with avoiding a heated public discourse between Crissy and Kevin than about what Crissy was posting. Emotions were high, and some cooling off needed to happen. I think it was a prudent move as it probably prevented a nasty exchange that would have done no one any good.

I'd tend to agree. I know Kevin likes Crissy and has always considered her a friend. He's gone out of his way to help her more than once. I think he just didn't want things to get any uglier than they had already gotten. He doesn't want to see her hurt most certainly, he just doesn't want her being a cause for more controversy. He's a smart guy, he's dotted his i's and crossed his t's.