![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Members
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 768
|
Quote:
I'm going to go out on a limb here, and I have not had the time to look into this, although i'm certain there is some truth to this: I wonder how Dubai, or ANY other country would feel about a US company with strong ties to the government taking ownership control of THEIR ports. Wealth in countries like Dubai are usually tied to royalty or strong connections with the ruling powers. I don't think Dubai is an immediate threat, and they've shown support for the war on terror which is Bush's argument, but at the same time, that doesn't mean things don't change over time, and how would we really know. Maybe us Democrats aren't as liberal as we seem, we just exercise common sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Trying to get enough posts to spam a link
I'm new!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North of the Motor City, MI.
Posts: 2
|
A clip from CBS:
Quote:
Yes, Home Land Security is suppose to handle security, but we all seen how they handled the US Gulf Coast. But more importantly pointed out in this thread is the management would LEARN the security procedtures of How port security is done. I also agree with Pornodoggy, NO foreign company should ever be able to the U.S. because of the enormous implications for national security. The only Good thing I see from this is GW Bush is loosing more power as now even the Reps. disagree with him... Ben |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Cramming 3 people in a Room to Attend Show
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Amid the Cornfields of Illinois
Posts: 5,366
|
Quote:
__________________
SEX STORY TEXT Exotic Material for Adult Websites Available for part time (project or ongoing) work ... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|