Calling all libs.....

[Carrie]

What do you mean by "...[h]e's already landed a dud in Alaska"?

You don't remember? Back in 2003 he plopped one in Alaska and made all kinds of threats that they were very close to being able to hit major US cities like Honolulu, LA, and Chicago and even more south like Houston.

Lemme find some links...

Here's some:
http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nati...7272311970.htm

http://www.americanfreepress.net/03_..._missile_.html

I remember at the time that Kim Jong Ill verified it and went into one of his schizophrenic rants about how he would soon be able to hit the major US cities, but now I can't find the damn quote. I even had it bookmarked back then, along with some info on submarines that the Chinese were building (with fuel cells and engines from Germany and France) that were going to start being delivered in '05 - can't find any of that now, either. (Kept an eye on that with me pops designing and building the towed sonar arrays the navy is using... they've had years to work on it and they're pretty sure they'll be able to hear these new silent Chinese subs using the fuel cells.)

There were quite a few different places with articles about it back then, then one paper (in Anchorage, I believe) put out a redirection article about how "it didn't hit alaska, it landed in the pacific, and it was years ago" and the whole thing went hush-hush. Typical cover-up BS to keep the people from panicking, even though KJI had verified it and was bragging about it, and said that Bush's attack on Iraq was a "sign" to him that we'd soon be attacking North Korea so he was stepping up their missile program.

[PornoDoggy]

Originally Posted by Carrie

What do you mean by "...[h]e's already landed a dud in Alaska"?

You don't remember? Back in 2003 he plopped one in Alaska and made all kinds of threats that they were very close to being able to hit major US cities like Honolulu, LA, and Chicago and even more south like Houston.

Lemme find some links...

Here's some:
http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nati...7272311970.htm

http://www.americanfreepress.net/03_..._missile_.html

I remember at the time that Kim Jong Ill verified it and went into one of his schizophrenic rants about how he would soon be able to hit the major US cities, but now I can't find the damn quote. I even had it bookmarked back then, along with some info on submarines that the Chinese were building (with fuel cells and engines from Germany and France) that were going to start being delivered in '05 - can't find any of that now, either. (Kept an eye on that with me pops designing and building the towed sonar arrays the navy is using... they've had years to work on it and they're pretty sure they'll be able to hear these new silent Chinese subs using the fuel cells.)

There were quite a few different places with articles about it back then, then one paper (in Anchorage, I believe) put out a redirection article about how "it didn't hit alaska, it landed in the pacific, and it was years ago" and the whole thing went hush-hush. Typical cover-up BS to keep the people from panicking, even though KJI had verified it and was bragging about it, and said that Bush's attack on Iraq was a "sign" to him that we'd soon be attacking North Korea so he was stepping up their missile program.

So what you are saying is that the biasedliberalmedia who delight in making up lies about Bush in their effort to bring him down in disgrace are cooperating with him in hiding this story, right? Methinks this has probably been more widely covered in the media outlets you follow than in the ones I follow - how's that for being polite?

As far as China's subs go - I am a lot more worried about hull coverings from Putinstan than I am about French engines or German fuel cells; I am even more worried about the degredation of overall ASW capabilities.

[JR]

Carrie, although many of us admire your solid, unwavering and sincere comittment to ignorance in everything you post, - It is with much regret to inform you that no missile ever "landed in Alaska" from N Korea. Even the article itself quotes someone as saying it landed "100's of miles" off the coast of Alaska and I should point out that US territorial waters only extend out to 200 miles and the waters of the State out to 24 miles. They did fire one over Japan to prove they had the range. The article contradicts itself with a title claiming "North Korean Missile Found In Alaska" which all referrences a Korea Times article that made this claim, which is allegedly referrencing US Intelligence documents and of course, offer no supporting evidence whatsoever. We understand that a snazzy headline is enough to make you bounce off the walls, but the rest of us tend to read the article, consider the evidence and the source before forming an opinion.

Suggesting that only you and a few less than credible websites know about this incident and declaring it a coverup, while entertaining, is not going to help you build a more credible case for impossible or unlikely occurances. Why not just move on to something more believable like alien autopsy's at Roswell and leave real world politics to people who are bold enough to remove their tin foil hats?

[Carrie]

Originally Posted by PornoDoggy

Methinks this has probably been more widely covered in the media outlets you follow than in the ones I follow - how's that for being polite?

Err... hon, take a look at those URLs. American Free Press is about as liberal as you can get.

JR - Although I applaud your attempt to look down your nose at everyone who does not agree with you, the "better than thou" insulting posts reveal exactly how low you are and why you have such a burning desire to be better than anyone. Have a nice day.

[JR]

Originally Posted by Carrie

JR - Although I applaud your attempt to look down your nose at everyone who does not agree with you, the "better than thou" insulting posts reveal exactly how low you are and why you have such a burning desire to be better than anyone. Have a nice day.

Actually, I respect people who do not agree with me. PD does not agree with me on much and I have a lot of respect for him. He is bright, educated and well spoken as are many here. I have no respect for your pompous ignorance. I speak my mind, just as you do. Usually I post just to start shit because I am bored. So anyway, why were you fired from Netpond again?

[Winetalk.com]

Originally Posted by JR

So anyway, why were you fired from Netpond again?

For being better than everyone else.