Easy Money in the Big Easy

[grimm]

From my favorite website:

"Easy Money in the Big Easy
By DAVE LINDORFF

The real idiocy of conservative free-market theory is being put on
display in New Orleans.

At last count, the administration and the Republican Congress have
pledged to throw $200 billion into New Orleans to "rebuild" the city.
The money will allegedly go to all sorts of private enterprise
projects designed to rebuild infrastructure, rebuild schools and
hospitals, repair sewer systems, etc.

Meanwhile, however, several hundred thousand poor New Orleans
residents who were flooded out of their city and who lost everything,
are scattered across the whole country, where they now live on
handouts, or welfare if they can get it. Most have little prospect of
finding work.

In New Orleans itself, the city, desperate for workers to restore
services, is laying off 3000 workers because, with no tax base, it is
de facto bankrupt.

Now it should be obvious to anyone with a lick of sense that the
logical thing for the federal government to do right now is to get
those people who lost their jobs and their homes in New Orleans back
into the city and at work restoring their storied metropolis to life.
It should be equally obvious that you can't rebuild a city that is
bankrupt and laying off its workforce, so clearly there should be a
subsidy to the local government in lieu of lost property taxes, which
could cover the rehiring of city workers.

The amount of money it would take to do all this would be far, far
less than the $200 billion Bush and Congress are talking about
spending, but it would do much more than all their money will.
Consider this: Hiring 100,000 people full-time for a year at $10/hour
would cost $2 billion dollars--just one percent of Bush's princely
promise. Hire them for the next five years, and you've still only
spent $10 billion. Hiring back 3000 city workers, even at $50,000 a
year per worker, would be $150 million, or $750 million over the next
five years. Even if you throw in the cost of the materials that will
be needed to clean and /or rebuild the housing in the city, we're
still talking single-digit billions of dollars. This is all chump
change to a federal government that is spending at least $5 billion a
month on the war in Iraq and that is talking about spending $200
billion on New Orleans.

Meanwhile, with a federal project based upon hiring the displaced
citizens of New Orleans, we'd be eliminating all the welfare payouts
to the evacuees, as well as a good deal of the Medicaid payments that
the federal government will end up repaying the states for.

What New Orleans really needs, in other words, is a kind of
combination TVA/Citizens Conservation Corps-type program-a federal
project to build Dutch-style levees that will withstand a Category 5
hurricane, to rebuild the whole city for everyone who wants to
return, and to do it the the maximum extend possible with local
labor.

This is all so obvious it shouldn't even need saying. And yet

It's not what's happening, and nobody, including the brain-dead and
soulless Democrats, is calling for it.

For the Republicans in power, ideology trumps logic. The last thing
they want to see is government doing something successfully.

Much better to let the evacuees stagnate and suffer and become a
burden on already strapped host communities across the nation, while
pumping ungodly sums of money into the coffers of well-connected
companies like Halliburton, Flour, Bechtel, etc., which will pretend
to be rebuilding New Orleans.

For the Democrats too, big federal projects that involve actually
giving needed jobs to people are anathema. Too much like the old New
Deal for modern tastes.

In the end, the losers will be the American taxpayer, who will have
subsidized one of the greatest public heists of all time, and the
people of New Orleans, who for the most part will no longer be able
to return to, or perhaps even recognize their city when Bush,
Congress and their corporate cronies get through with the place."

[Red]

That's a great article.
Too bad no one in power is paying attention to it.

[Dravyk]

Why doesn't anyone do the goddamned son of a bitch fucking obvious and BUILD THE GROUND HIGHER SO IT'S ABOVE SEA LEVEL?!?!?!

Now, when people aren't there, when houses can't be saved, etc, is the time to do it. Do they? No!

This same scenario is going to be repeated over and over and over again until the freaking obvious is done!!!!!

[domtheboy]

I wonder how much of that $200 billion is going to be spent on some proper protection (i.e. levies that work) to avoid a repeat performance the next time there is a severe storm. Might not be a bad idea given that you guys have had 2 massive storms in less than 2 months.

But then again, what do us Brits know eh ?

[OldJeff]

Anyone taking bets that there is a shitload of work for Halliburton that happens