![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Cramming 3 people in a Room to Attend Show
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Amid the Cornfields of Illinois
Posts: 5,366
|
Just out of curiousity ... question for the non-'merikin folks on the board.
In the U.S., in spite of the devestation it caused, the 1918-1919 flu pandemic was almost non-history for many years. I'm a history buff, and I've heard more about it in the last 10-12 years than I did "officially" all the years before that. My mother's parents both lost several siblings to the epidemic (they were farm people, each from families with 10+ children), so I did a little digging when I was a teenager, and there was suprisingly little info about it, considering the numbers. Is that also true in Europe? Is it - glossed over? - because of the huge numbers of people who died?
__________________
SEX STORY TEXT Exotic Material for Adult Websites Available for part time (project or ongoing) work ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Members
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Six Feet Under
Posts: 2,150
|
Quote:
I think this put the spanish flu into perspective "In 24 weeks, it took more lives than AIDS has in 24 years." .... ofcourse with AIDS being a slow killer it can do more harm long term, but if there had been as many humans in 1918 as we are today, then it could have killed 4 times the amount it did... 80-200 million people world wide in months...
__________________
"Chaos is the law of nature, order is the dream of man." ~Henry B. Adams (Historian) 1838-1918 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|