hey YOU fucking hypocrite republicans, still glad you voted for Bush?

[Rolo]

Originally Posted by XxXotic

was nothing to figure out really, he has a valid point. Almost every person I know who voted for bush has said those EXACT words to me "Would Kerry have done anything different?"

who's to say what woulda, coulda, shoulda been done and if that's your only defense then you've pretty much proven yourself a fool who can't admit you were wrong.

So by your logic the question "hey YOU fucking hypocrite republicans, still glad you voted for Bush?" is really not a question to be answered by ex. taking the 2 only presidential candidates and comparing them, if you had to vote again

The question asked in this thread was not "Do you think Bush is doing a good job?"... no the question was "hey YOU fucking hypocrite republicans, still glad you voted for Bush?"...

[XxXotic]

Originally Posted by Rolo

So by your logic the question "hey YOU fucking hypocrite republicans, still glad you voted for Bush?" is really not a question to be answered by ex. taking the 2 only presidential candidates and comparing them, if you had to vote again

The question asked in this thread was not "Do you think Bush is doing a good job?"... no the question was "hey YOU fucking hypocrite republicans, still glad you voted for Bush?"...

does it matter? No. Regardless of the question, if your answer is "would kerry have done any better" you're an idiot. No one here is Kreskin, nor do we have the ability to turn back time and see the future to say whether he would or would not have.

If your best defense of Bush is that question, you're obviously trying to back pedal and defend your position of weakness because you know bush fucked up and now you feel foolish for supporting a criminal.

We can argue semantics all day, fact remains, he does have a valid point if that's the best comeback anyone can come up with

[Rolo]

Originally Posted by XxXotic

If your best defense of Bush is that question, you're obviously trying to back pedal and defend your position of weakness because you know bush fucked up and now you feel foolish for supporting a criminal.

Even the genius ask questions - but I´m glad that I´m now also weak, foolish and supporting the criminals... makes me almost sound like I´m a Democrat

[XxXotic]

Originally Posted by Rolo

Even the genius ask questions - but I´m glad that I´m now also weak, foolish and supporting the criminals... makes me almost sound like I´m a Democrat

I didn't mean you specifically, just saying you in general (meaning anyone using that argument) but if "would kerry do any better" is your stance, then yes you are in fact weak and foolish because it's irrelevant to the fact

[JR]

Originally Posted by XxXotic

does it matter? No. Regardless of the question, if your answer is "would kerry have done any better" you're an idiot. No one here is Kreskin, nor do we have the ability to turn back time and see the future to say whether he would or would not have.

If your best defense of Bush is that question, you're obviously trying to back pedal and defend your position of weakness because you know bush fucked up and now you feel foolish for supporting a criminal.

We can argue semantics all day, fact remains, he does have a valid point if that's the best comeback anyone can come up with

asking the question "would kerry have done it all better" is not an admission of anything, not a defense of anything and certainly not proof of someone being wrong. to state that is, also assumes that Kerry would have been better which simply cannot be proven. you might want to believe it and thats fine. but it can't be proven. are you starting to see the flaws in your logic yet? be angry, thats fine... be upset... great! but do try to be rational and not resort to the reasoning of a 5 year old to defend your point.

what you are trying to say in a very backwards and illogical way is that YOU feel everyone who voted for bush was wrong and that YOU are angry and upset.

[XxXotic]

Originally Posted by JR

asking the question "would kerry have done it all better" is not an admission of anything, not a defense of anything and certainly not proof of someone being wrong. to state that is, also assumes that Kerry would have been better which simply cannot be proven. you might want to believe it and thats fine. but it can't be proven. are you starting to see the flaws in your logic yet? be angry, thats fine... be upset... great! but do try to be rational and not resort to the reasoning of a 5 year old to defend your point.

what you are trying to say in a very backwards and illogical way is that YOU feel everyone who voted for bush was wrong and that YOU are angry and upset.

if you say so Dr. Phil. I'd worry less about trying to psycho-analyze my posts and more about the real point here. I didn't say Kerry would do a better job, though in my opinion a fresh pile of dog shit could do a better job then Bush has. I'm not angry, or upset... there's no point to it. How do you figure I'm acting like a 5 year old? Because I backed up someone's point which was valid? Get over yourself long enough to realize it was in fact a valid point that he made. Nothing more. And once you're done getting over yourself, please tell me how I have the "reasoning of a 5 year old" because I said what I did? Sorry, if it makes me a 5 year old to think that anyone whose only response is "would so and so do a better job" is a fucking idiot. Who cares who *would have* done a better job, the fact is it's Bush's job and he's fucked up monumentally.

You're too hung up on the what if's and not the what is. Maybe when you actually reach the reasoning levels of a 5 year old, you'll understand that point.

And for the record, if I believe something, I'll let you know, until then do me the favor of not putting words in my mouth.

Originally Posted by XxXotic

if you say so Dr. Phil. I'd worry less about trying to psycho-analyze my posts and more about the real point here. I didn't say Kerry would do a better job, though in my opinion a fresh pile of dog shit could do a better job then Bush has. I'm not angry, or upset... there's no point to it. How do you figure I'm acting like a 5 year old? Because I backed up someone's point which was valid? Get over yourself long enough to realize it was in fact a valid point that he made. Nothing more. And once you're done getting over yourself, please tell me how I have the "reasoning of a 5 year old" because I said what I did? Sorry, if it makes me a 5 year old to think that anyone whose only response is "would so and so do a better job" is a fucking idiot. Who cares who *would have* done a better job, the fact is it's Bush's job and he's fucked up monumentally.

You're too hung up on the what if's and not the what is. Maybe when you actually reach the reasoning levels of a 5 year old, you'll understand that point.

And for the record, if I believe something, I'll let you know, until then do me the favor of not putting words in my mouth.

i have never seen someone sooo "no angry" that soooooo needed anger management therapy. you have missed every point entirely to keep chanting that bush is an asshole. no one is disputing this and you continue to make my point for me as your first assumption and the basis of your rambling is that i am pro-bush, which i am not.

thanks again!

[JR]

^^^^

me again.

[XxXotic]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

i have never seen someone sooo "no angry" that soooooo needed anger management therapy. you have missed every point entirely to keep chanting that bush is an asshole. no one is disputing this and you continue to make my point for me as your first assumption and the basis of your rambling is that i am pro-bush, which i am not.

thanks again!

I'm sorry, I must have missed the part where I said you were pro-anything, let alone pro-bush. I wasn't even talking to you moron, I WAS talking to Rolo, and you decided to step in like you fucking know me or know anything for that matter.

You've said absolutely nothing of substance and have done nothing but put words in my mouth which is what people who have no argument or leg to stand on tend to do.

"flaws in your argument" about what? Did you even bother to read anything I said? Obviously not because I NEVER SAID KERRY WOULD HAVE DONE BETTER THEN BUSH yet you're basing your entire argument on just that. Do I think the winner of the 100 yard dash at the special olympics could do better then bush? Yes, I do but that's NOT the point. (which I said in my 1st post, had you bothered to read it) Like I said before, since obviously reading isn't your strong point, You're too focused on the "what if's" and not the "what is". Do yourself a favor and actually read before you bother opening your mouth.

I can feel myself getting dumber just responding to your posts

[JR]

Originally Posted by XxXotic

I can feel myself getting dumber just responding to your posts

the enevitable result of you trying to think, apparently. save your strength big guy, i will stop posting because i can see its not in your own best interest and i did not intend to compromise your mental health.

you are a very angry person. its regretful. life is very short. you will not change the fact that Bush is president with your anger and rage. you only hurt yourself and those around you unless of course you also think that Bush is feeling your pain with his CIA approved brainwave scanner - but i am sure you have taken the necessary precautions for that as well.