![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Members
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 42
|
I have 4 different content management scripts that I mention to webmasters
who ask. Two are free, open source scripts, one is a unique dynamic script I initially wrote for content sites, and the other is a typical commerical script. Looking at what webmasters choose of the four, a pretty admin area sells intially, but a basic, clear, easy to use admin makes them much happier in the long run. They'll buy the pretty one, then bad mouth it on the boards and have me install the plainer looking one that is easier to use and adapt to different situations because the system design is logically correct. Don't get your hopes up too high, by the way. Webmasters all want things a bit different and unless your database was designed by a true data architecture professional who really understands relational theory and did it right, you're going to have a lot of work to do in order accomodate what would seem to be trivial enhancements and changes. When you do encounter the first feature requests (or complaints) that require the code to be reworked, consider saving yourself a lot of money in the long run by redoing your database schema to be absolutely solid rather than coding around logical flaws in the schema. A real pro who can get the schema right will cost you some money, but a oot less money than coding around an incorrect schema for the next 5 years.
__________________
Ray Morris support AT bettercgi.com Strongbox - The next generation in site security Throttlebox - The next generation in intelligent bandwidth control Clonebox - Backup (disaster recovery) on steroids Make money with your sig |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|