what would moores sya if Bush did NOTHING

[Winetalk.com]

Originally posted by RawAlex@Jun 28 2004, 04:24 PM
Serge, wrong, I am all for engagement - but that doesn't mean all out war without any real backup. Yes, I know, the coalition of the willing - which was a nice way of saying "The US military and anyone else we could find to lend us 10 troops and a jeep". Very few of the major players from Gulf War I were back this time.

Without the fudged proof of WMD, it would have probably been the US all alone.

My question always is this: Why is Iraq different from North Korea, different from Lybia, different from Iran, etc? I don't see where NK's actual nuclear weapons are less of a threat than Saddam MAYBE having WMDs... I just don't get the logic.

Then again, I ain't a repulican... maybe it's something you understand once you get the magic decoder ring.

Alex

yeah,
you avoid engaement with me and I'll answer your question nevertheless:
take a look at the MAP and YOU'll see WHy Iraq is different from all of the above