If your considering copy and pasting your latest drive by spam here because you cant find any other place.
DONT!
Oprano has a ZERO tolerance policy for spam. Yours WILL be deleted. If you are looking for more exposure for your product please contact advertising@oprano.com for more information.
Legacy Archived Main BoardBusiness chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.
Originally posted by gonzo@Nov 12 2003, 10:54 PM The connection is that any of the 3 of us would actually enjoy watching you in a prison video. Serge might even get out ze brromstick and massage that prostate for you.
Bow to the power of a Saucerhead.
from page 5.........
HOW TO GET ASS FUCKED:
Prostrate Gland Stimulations
There are many types of action that produce prostrate gland stimulations.
Meeting a woman with a big strap on
Meeting a Russian with a broomstick
Screwing around on webmaster boards
Posting illegal content on websites
Participating in pedophile type activities
Promoting adult sites to minors
Mutual Fisting
Male Receiving Anal Sex ( Greek )
Female Receiving Anal Sex ( Backwards Greek )
Just acting like a total moron, and others.
If the penetration position or activity does not stimulate the prostrate gland - an ass fucking has not occurred regardless of gender.
Cassie ...
lol ...
you really don't know how bad this looks upon yourself ...
; )
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
John Beacock claims that his site is not a "porn site", but rather an educational site. Let's take a look.
Currently on his site there are many graphics that are showing up as red X's which have the text Increase graphic sizes by turning on advertising banners. Get maximum size graphics with a FREE AVS Membership!
So his site is "educational", yet he is encouraging visitors to sign up for an Adult Verification Service where they will have access to thousands of porn sites.
He currently quotes many emails allegedly from children (and he states their ages). Here is one answer he gave to an alleged child of 11 years old: Well, guess what ? Even infants masturbate. Huh ! Ya - that is right. Most boys and girls masturbate (play with themselves). They do not know the word masturbation but they know it feels good.
In fact us boys can get an erection pretty much the day we are born. So don't worry if you played with yourself before you say you started puberty. I am not encouraging this - just saying it will not harm you in anyway.
Girls do it too. Yes in the bath tub or have you ever seen a girl rocking on a rocking horse ? Is she going somewhere or rubbing herself on it ? You decide.
I don't know about you guys, but I do not plan to tell my sons when they are 11 that little girls on rocking horses are rubbing themselves for sexual stimulation. THIS is the type of responsible education that he is giving to children?
His site currently references background images and videos from unlicensed sources - ie: the "infamous Ally McBeal kiss" (video) and a fully scanned cover of Time magazine.
His site that is not "porn" did at one time feature videos from IDeepThroat.com. These videos were publically accessible and he claimed that he was using them for educational purposes. This is a quote of him stating that his site is not porn: Posting a generic blurb about 2257 on my homepage - gives a wrong impression on what the site is about. SexEducation.com is not a "porn" site - by any definition of "pornography"
I do not know how to link directly to a specific post, so I instead have hit the "Quote" button on those posts and will be linking to those 'quote' pages.
Here he admits to having a picture of a nude minor on his site, and claims that he does not need 2257 info for the picture because since she is underage, her parents cannot sign for her photo to be released.
Here again he admits to having a picture of a nude minor, and states that it was one of 16 that he downloaded "from several sources". He states that the child is "several years old".
In this quote, he reposts an article he had on his website entitled "Child Pornography - A Pictoral Essay". At the time of publishing, this article was enhanced, as the title states, by images of child pornography. They have since been removed. In the article he says: At what age does the female body become acceptable to display?
Well at any age - duh : )
The real legal question is - at what age can a person sell their likeness for profit?
He then goes on to question whether a child "selling" photographs of themselves for candy or toys should be considered "legal".
He finishes this "essay" off by stating: The answer is - YES : ) There is a legal basis for minors to sue for compensation and punitive damages, if their identity is used for commercial profit.
Note that he only makes a caveat for commercial profit, but not for the perverted personal collection that was never intended to be distributed commercially.
In this quote he is directly asked some very interesting questions, and gives his answers. He admits to NOT having the 2257 information for all models appearing in explicit images in his site, and then says that it is not illegal to post pictures of nude children in his home country of Canada.
In this quote he admits to having pictures of minors on his site that were nude, and that children and teens CAN access his member's section "with adult supervision". 1. Did you have kiddie porn on your site?
2. Did you have any pictures of minors on your site that were nude?
3. Did you have something on your site saying that children or teens can access your members section with adult supervision?
4. Have you ever been in trouble with the law about sex with minors or anything of that nature?
#1: NO
#2: YES
#3: Still do.
#4: No
-His "non porn site" has been banned for illegal content by SexKey - a well known ADULT verification service that allows access to explicit pornographic websites.
-His "non porn site" has been banned for illegal content by FreeNetPass - a well known ADULT verification service that allows access to explicit pornographic websites.
His claims that he is not interested in child pornography, in spite of his own quotes above.
The Wayback Machine at Archive.Org tells a different story.
You can access the full list of its snapshots of his website here.
Just clicking on one at random (Oct. 18, 2000), here are the meta tags that I find: META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="sex, oral sex, anal sex, safe sex, safer sex, teen sex, lolita sex, sex pictures,sex graphics, sex pix, sex videos, sex mpg, sex chat, sexual intercourse, yahoo, hotmail, icq, odigo, dick, porno, suck, fuck, penis, cock, vagina, tits, ass, cunt, pussy, cum"
Note the child pornography terms there.
On this same page, in the meta description, he states that his site is open to everyone - he even gives an age of 13, and goes on to describe the 'increasingly more sexually explicit material' that it has. META NAME="description" content="FREE MEMBERSHIP - ALL AGES WELCOME (13+)
SexEducation.com is an E-Zine of sexual intercourse (discussion). There are three
viewing areas; VISITORS, TEENS & ADULTS. Each area presents increasingly more
sexually explicit material. Hundreds of pages, 5+ years in the making.
All areas are free to access. Sex Chat, full color graphics (pix/pics). COME VISIT OUR ONLINE STORE"
And as he's inviting in the 13yr olds, his site's title lets them know that they can find such things as teen sex, adult sex, and sex videos: # SexEducation.com : ALL AGES (13+), E-Zine of Sexual Intercourse, Sexual Relationships, Sexual Techniques, Sex Chat, Sex Questions, Sex Answers, Sex Health, Oral Sex, Teen Sex, Adult Sex, Sex Techniques, Sex Pix, Sex Videos
Yet his site is not a porn site.
And his site does not cater to children - yet he gladly posts emails from children throughout his site.
Also, take a look at his email address. DAD @ sexeducation...
He is inviting 13yr olds to visit his site and view increasingly sexually explicit graphics and videos of teen sex. He posts video clips of a woman giving blowjobs from "IDeepThroat.com". He posts pictures of naked, underage children. He tries to encourage these 13yr old visitors to get even larger versions of the sexually explicit pictures on his site by signing up for an AVS service (where they'll also be exposed to thousands of adult porn sites).
And on top of that, when these children email him, he wants them to call him DAD.
Because of the fallout of his own admissions on GFY and other boards, he has removed most (if not all) of the images from his site. Using the WayBack machine, however, I was able to find an image of a man and a woman having sex, where the woman was rubbing her clitoris. There was no statement made about the couple's age, and yes, the picture was completely and freely accessible.
In spite of him removing these images, people do have screen captures of his site when he had them up. Lady Mischief is one of these people. She will not post the screen captures on any boards of course as they show child pornography. However if you contact her she has reams and reams of information on this man and would most likely send you the screen captures.
Now.
I have made no statements here which are not backed up immediately with posted proof from John Beacock himself, or with cached versions of his site from the completely objective site Archive.Org.
Make your own decisions.
SexEd, don't ever call me a fucking liar. I come with PROOF.
__________________
Need a kick-ass design done quickly?
I recommend Sex Creator - they absolutely ROCK.
Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 12 2003, 09:54 PM John Beacock claims that his site is not a "porn site", but rather an educational site. Let's take a look.
Currently on his site there are many graphics that are showing up as red X's which have the text Increase graphic sizes by turning on advertising banners. Get maximum size graphics with a FREE AVS Membership!
So his site is "educational", yet he is encouraging visitors to sign up for an Adult Verification Service where they will have access to thousands of porn sites.
He currently quotes many emails allegedly from children (and he states their ages). Here is one answer he gave to an alleged child of 11 years old: Well, guess what ? Even infants masturbate. Huh ! Ya - that is right. Most boys and girls masturbate (play with themselves). They do not know the word masturbation but they know it feels good.
In fact us boys can get an erection pretty much the day we are born. So don't worry if you played with yourself before you say you started puberty. I am not encouraging this - just saying it will not harm you in anyway.
Girls do it too. Yes in the bath tub or have you ever seen a girl rocking on a rocking horse ? Is she going somewhere or rubbing herself on it ? You decide.
I don't know about you guys, but I do not plan to tell my sons when they are 11 that little girls on rocking horses are rubbing themselves for sexual stimulation. THIS is the type of responsible education that he is giving to children?
His site currently references background images and videos from unlicensed sources - ie: the "infamous Ally McBeal kiss" (video) and a fully scanned cover of Time magazine.
His site that is not "porn" did at one time feature videos from IDeepThroat.com. These videos were publically accessible and he claimed that he was using them for educational purposes. This is a quote of him stating that his site is not porn: Posting a generic blurb about 2257 on my homepage - gives a wrong impression on what the site is about. SexEducation.com is not a "porn" site - by any definition of "pornography"
I do not know how to link directly to a specific post, so I instead have hit the "Quote" button on those posts and will be linking to those 'quote' pages.
Here he admits to having a picture of a nude minor on his site, and claims that he does not need 2257 info for the picture because since she is underage, her parents cannot sign for her photo to be released.
Here again he admits to having a picture of a nude minor, and states that it was one of 16 that he downloaded "from several sources". He states that the child is "several years old".
In this quote, he reposts an article he had on his website entitled "Child Pornography - A Pictoral Essay". At the time of publishing, this article was enhanced, as the title states, by images of child pornography. They have since been removed. In the article he says: At what age does the female body become acceptable to display?
Well at any age - duh : )
The real legal question is - at what age can a person sell their likeness for profit?
He then goes on to question whether a child "selling" photographs of themselves for candy or toys should be considered "legal".
He finishes this "essay" off by stating: The answer is - YES : ) There is a legal basis for minors to sue for compensation and punitive damages, if their identity is used for commercial profit.
Note that he only makes a caveat for commercial profit, but not for the perverted personal collection that was never intended to be distributed commercially.
In this quote he is directly asked some very interesting questions, and gives his answers. He admits to NOT having the 2257 information for all models appearing in explicit images in his site, and then says that it is not illegal to post pictures of nude children in his home country of Canada.
In this quote he admits to having pictures of minors on his site that were nude, and that children and teens CAN access his member's section "with adult supervision". 1. Did you have kiddie porn on your site?
2. Did you have any pictures of minors on your site that were nude?
3. Did you have something on your site saying that children or teens can access your members section with adult supervision?
4. Have you ever been in trouble with the law about sex with minors or anything of that nature?
#1: NO
#2: YES
#3: Still do.
#4: No
-His "non porn site" has been banned for illegal content by SexKey - a well known ADULT verification service that allows access to explicit pornographic websites.
-His "non porn site" has been banned for illegal content by FreeNetPass - a well known ADULT verification service that allows access to explicit pornographic websites.
His claims that he is not interested in child pornography, in spite of his own quotes above.
The Wayback Machine at Archive.Org tells a different story.
You can access the full list of its snapshots of his website here.
Just clicking on one at random (Oct. 18, 2000), here are the meta tags that I find: META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="sex, oral sex, anal sex, safe sex, safer sex, teen sex, lolita sex, sex pictures,sex graphics, sex pix, sex videos, sex mpg, sex chat, sexual intercourse, yahoo, hotmail, icq, odigo, dick, porno, suck, fuck, penis, cock, vagina, tits, ass, cunt, pussy, cum"
Note the child pornography terms there.
On this same page, in the meta description, he states that his site is open to everyone - he even gives an age of 13, and goes on to describe the 'increasingly more sexually explicit material' that it has. META NAME="description" content="FREE MEMBERSHIP - ALL AGES WELCOME (13+)
SexEducation.com is an E-Zine of sexual intercourse (discussion). There are three
viewing areas; VISITORS, TEENS & ADULTS. Each area presents increasingly more
sexually explicit material. Hundreds of pages, 5+ years in the making.
All areas are free to access. Sex Chat, full color graphics (pix/pics). COME VISIT OUR ONLINE STORE"
And as he's inviting in the 13yr olds, his site's title lets them know that they can find such things as teen sex, adult sex, and sex videos: # SexEducation.com : ALL AGES (13+), E-Zine of Sexual Intercourse, Sexual Relationships, Sexual Techniques, Sex Chat, Sex Questions, Sex Answers, Sex Health, Oral Sex, Teen Sex, Adult Sex, Sex Techniques, Sex Pix, Sex Videos
Yet his site is not a porn site.
And his site does not cater to children - yet he gladly posts emails from children throughout his site.
Also, take a look at his email address. DAD @ sexeducation...
He is inviting 13yr olds to visit his site and view increasingly sexually explicit graphics and videos of teen sex. He posts video clips of a woman giving blowjobs from "IDeepThroat.com". He posts pictures of naked, underage children. He tries to encourage these 13yr old visitors to get even larger versions of the sexually explicit pictures on his site by signing up for an AVS service (where they'll also be exposed to thousands of adult porn sites).
And on top of that, when these children email him, he wants them to call him DAD.
Because of the fallout of his own admissions on GFY and other boards, he has removed most (if not all) of the images from his site. Using the WayBack machine, however, I was able to find an image of a man and a woman having sex, where the woman was rubbing her clitoris. There was no statement made about the couple's age, and yes, the picture was completely and freely accessible.
In spite of him removing these images, people do have screen captures of his site when he had them up. Lady Mischief is one of these people. She will not post the screen captures on any boards of course as they show child pornography. However if you contact her she has reams and reams of information on this man and would most likely send you the screen captures.
Now.
I have made no statements here which are not backed up immediately with posted proof from John Beacock himself, or with cached versions of his site from the completely objective site Archive.Org.
Make your own decisions.
SexEd, don't ever call me a fucking liar. I come with PROOF.
I am going to assume all this is true as I have no cause to question Carrie's credibility. So the only question that remains is why is this parasite still allowed to walk free? Why isn't he already being prosecuted or better yet, behind bars making a whole new batch of special friends who HE can call DAD?
To hell with banning him, someone needs to produce all that dirt for the Canadian officials who can do something real and meaningful with this info.
Buh-Bye SexEd
hey, maybe in prison you can explore the whole anal orgasm thing! Be sure to pen an article bout it k?
John Beacock claims that his site is not a "porn site", but rather an educational site. Let's take a look.
I don't claim my website is an educational site.
It is a magazine of global sexual intercourse.
More specifically a magazine which invokes discussion about controversial sexual topics. You claim it to be "educational" whereas my Access Policy clearly states it is for "entertainment".
Currently on his site there are many graphics that are showing up as red X's which have the text Increase graphic sizes by turning on advertising banners. Get maximum size graphics with a FREE AVS Membership!
So his site is "educational", yet he is encouraging visitors to sign up for an Adult Verification Service where they will have access to thousands of porn sites.
SexEducation.com has been 100% anonymous since inception and will remain that way. In some countries of the world women are stoned to death just for showing their ankles.
Anonymity is a priority for SexEducation.com.
Hence, I will NEVER agree to 2% of gross sales with Acacia because it really means "we don't believe you show me your books."
He currently quotes many emails allegedly from children (and he states their ages). Here is one answer he gave to an alleged child of 11 years old: Well, guess what ? Even infants masturbate. Huh ! Ya - that is right. Most boys and girls masturbate (play with themselves). They do not know the word masturbation but they know it feels good.
In fact us boys can get an erection pretty much the day we are born. So don't worry if you played with yourself before you say you started puberty. I am not encouraging this - just saying it will not harm you in anyway.
Girls do it too. Yes in the bath tub or have you ever seen a girl rocking on a rocking horse ? Is she going somewhere or rubbing herself on it ? You decide.
Yes - it is a scientific fact that infants have erections and play with themselves. They don't know what they are doing - but they do - do it.
I guess you have never changed a male infants diaper with an erection.
Grow up ... grow up... Every Parent has seen their infant child with an erection. Grow up ... like yawn ...
You disgust me ...
I don't know about you guys, but I do not plan to tell my sons when they are 11 that little girls on rocking horses are rubbing themselves for sexual stimulation. THIS is the type of responsible education that he is giving to children?
My website is not for children. It is a resource of material that Parents choose which article they wish to adapt to their own needs. But when you get a tough question - from your teen - I betcha you can find a "tough" type answer on SexEducation.com [Caveat - the site is broken right now.]
His site currently references background images and videos from unlicensed sources - ie: the "infamous Ally McBeal kiss" (video) and a fully scanned cover of Time magazine.
Many of those will be coming back under "fair use" of a magazine that performs sexual research. I am waiting for this Acacia thing to blow over.
His site that is not "porn" did at one time feature videos from IDeepThroat.com. These videos were publically accessible and he claimed that he was using them for educational purposes.
Heather at IDeepThroat.com ( A mother) gave me permission to use her content. She is still on my contact list. Yes - Adult women want to know how to do that. In fact, increasingly so as the adult industry continued to post that type of material on their directly accessed domain names ( which I am against). The adult industry helped to make many women feel inadequate because all they say was the extreme shit when the went looking for the physical knowledge of how to perform sex. In fact, on Xbiz I am engaged in a discussion about this right now.
[i] This is a quote of him stating that his site is not porn: Posting a generic blurb about 2257 on my homepage - gives a wrong impression on what the site is about. SexEducation.com is not a "porn" site - by any definition of "pornography"
The discussion of porn sites and the discussion of the graphics inherently means you have to post some of that.
I do not know how to link directly to a specific post, so I instead have hit the "Quote" button on those posts and will be linking to those 'quote' pages.
Here he admits to having a picture of a nude minor on his site, and claims that he does not need 2257 info for the picture because since she is underage, her parents cannot sign for her photo to be released.
The article "Child Pornography - A Photo Essay by Dad@" discusses how minors can sue ANY WEBSITE which profited from the exposure of her likeness for profit. Then ended in a challenge to George W. Bush to do something about WhiteHouse.com. I won. That article is still talked about until this day and now that fucking porn site "WhiteHouse.com" is WHITEHOUSESEX.COM ...roflmao ... they got toasted by a Master Blogger.
Dad@
Here again he admits to having a picture of a nude minor, and states that it was one of 16 that he downloaded "from several sources". He states that the child is "several years old".
I don't have any graphics now.
Posting a picture of a minor is not illegal in Canada.
If it was - then you could not post the diagrams of how to change a diaper, breast feeding, male infant circumcision etc ...
grow the fuck up ...
what hypocrisy you show ...
and you're a "playa" ...roflmao
In this quote, he reposts an article he had on his website entitled "Child Pornography - A Pictoral Essay". At the time of publishing, this article was enhanced, as the title states, by images of child pornography. They have since been removed. In the article he says: At what age does the female body become acceptable to display?
Well at any age - duh : )
The real legal question is - at what age can a person sell their likeness for profit?
He then goes on to question whether a child "selling" photographs of themselves for candy or toys should be considered "legal".
He finishes this "essay" off by stating: The answer is - YES : ) There is a legal basis for minors to sue for compensation and punitive damages, if their identity is used for commercial profit.
EXPLAINED ABOVE ....
Note that he only makes a caveat for commercial profit, but not for the perverted personal collection that was never intended to be distributed commercially.
grow up ...
or go after all diaper commercials ...
and 11 year old models in the Sears Catelogue
In this quote he is directly asked some very interesting questions, and gives his answers. He admits to NOT having the 2257 information for all models appearing in explicit images in his site, and then says that it is not illegal to post pictures of nude children in his home country of Canada.
YA ... When I bought the Corel Draw 100,000 clip art collection and used it's graphics - they did not have to be 2257 compliant ...
In this quote he admits to having pictures of minors on his site that were nude, and that children and teens CAN access his member's section "with adult supervision".
The site is/was fully customizable to a Parent's wishes.
Graphics on or off.
Advertising on or off.
almost everything can be blocked or modified.
The site is for Parents not for children like yourself.
TEXT DELETED ...
BORING
SexEd, don't ever call me a fucking liar. I come with PROOF.
You said I had graphics of children engaged in sexual acts ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...
You said I admitted I was a pedophile ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...
YOU SHOULD BE BANNED AS YOU HAVE BROKE SERGE'S NUMBER ONE RULE.
Plain and simple ...
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 10:48 PM [
Get a clue pedo d@d --
If we arent banning you we sure as hell arent banning Carrie.
Come one to Vegas and Ill show you some Southern hospitality from a Master Logger to the MasterBlogger.
__________________
We are putting the bastards of this world on notice; greed and corruption will always be met with "a voice made of ink and rage."
"Never try and be like anyone else" - Hunter S. Thompson
"The truth is the truth no matter how you try and package a lie" - Shellee Hale
And sexed.... From what I have read, you had absolutely nothing, nada, zilch to do with whithouse.com coming down and having to go back up as whitehousesex.com....
That fight was being fought from day one of the site opening...
and your "information" pages (sexeducation.org) where you preach the rhythm method as a viable form of birth control....
You should be shot for that alone......
Now BOW TO THE POWER !!!!!
Last edited by sexeducatoon.com at Nov 13 2003, 07:57 PM
I have posted enough proof - your OWN words are your judge and jury, my dear.
The arguments you gave above are laughable. Hell, half of them don't even deal with what you quoted but instead try to run off on a tangent to avoid the subject.
I have never tried to be a "playa" - yet evidently you think I am one since you keep referencing me as such, showing how little you truly know about this business.
If you want me banned, go for it dearheart, I'm standing right here.
Oh yeah - where is that nonexistent proof you were digging up of where you pinned me multiple times?
YOU think that little girls ride rocking horses for sexual gratification.
YOU force the children who write to you to call you "Dad".
YOU use terms like "lolita" and "teen sex" to attract visitors to your web site.
YOU post pictures of graphical sexual activities and videos on a site that you invite 13yr old children to.
IN MY OPINION, YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE. YOU ARE A DANGEROUS MAN THAT SHOULD BE RESTRICTED FROM COMING WITHIN 50 FEET OF ANY MINOR CHILD AND SHOULD HAVE ALL ABILITY TO ACCESS THE INTERNET REMOVED.
You want to sue me for my opinion? Go right ahead. I'm right here.
And the ONLY time I will EVER make a physical motion anywhere near "bowing" to you will be the day you come within 50 feet of my children and I'm bending over to check your pulse.
__________________
Need a kick-ass design done quickly?
I recommend Sex Creator - they absolutely ROCK.
HOW TO SEX:
Combined Fertility Cycle
Sperm live for up to five days - male fertility cycle.
An egg lives for up to two days - female fertility cycle.
Through observations and the recording of female menstrual signs - an accurate diary can be used to predict the Combined Fertility Cycle.
The Combined Fertility Cycle is different for each partner sex couple.
During the Combined Fertility Cycle partner sex couples can choose or avoid pregnancy.
No person should be having partner sex - of any kind, unless they know how to calculate the Combined Fertility Cycle (CFC) as they are not intellectually ready.
Promoting the Idea of the "Combined Fertility Cycle" otherwise known as the Rhythm Method
This really has nothing to do with the topic at hand other than those that promote it deserve a good old fashioned ass fucking and those who practice it will probably feel like they have been ass fucked after they end up contributing to the uncontrolled population growth of our planet. Of all available birth control methods, this is probably the most fallible
Sperm live for up to five days except when they manage to survive longer than that- male fertility cycle.
An egg lives for up to two days except when they decide that life is good and go for five or six days- female fertility cycle.
Through observations and the recording of female menstrual signs - an accurate diary can be used to predict the Combined Fertility Cycle. It is important to note that this prediction is accurate to + or - 30 days in either direction.
The Combined Fertility Cycle is different for each partner sex couple with the only sure thing being is that it can change on a dime.
During the Combined Fertility Cycle partner sex couples can choose or avoid pregnancy by not fucking or using some other form of birth control.
No person should be having partner sex - of any kind, unless they realize that calculating the Combined Fertility Cycle (CFC) is a total waste of time and they are not intellectually ready. Any person that relies on this methodology to avoid a pregnancy deserves a good old fashioned ass fucking, and any person who promotes this methodology as a viable birth control methodology is probably receiving an ass fucking at this very moment.
You said I had graphics of children engaged in sexual acts ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...
You said I admitted I was a pedophile ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...
YOU SHOULD BE BANNED AS YOU HAVE BROKE SERGE'S NUMBER ONE RULE.
You attacked the financial health of a member of this board.
Plain and simple ...
POST YOUR FUCKING PROOF ...
about these two statements ...
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
1. I have already posted proof - where your "essay" on child pornography INCLUDED pictures of children engaged in child pornography - as stated so yourself. I also said LadyM had screenshots - learn to read.
2. Yes, you have admitted you are a pedophile. You use pedophilic words such as "lolita" and "teen sex" on your site and invite 13yr olds to visit your site, I posted proof of you engaging in a conversation with an 11yr old boy trying to convince him of your sick thoughts that little girls ride rocking horses for sexual gratification. I posted proof of you showing graphic sex to children and explicit pictures to children in your replies to them. I posted proof of you admitting to having a nude photo (one of 16) of an underage girl on your site.
Do you not know what the definition of pedophile is?
3. If you want me banned, go for it.
I have posted proof, you have posted none. It is evident who the liar here is. I am finished speaking to you. And I repeat - do NOT come within 50 feet of my children. I will consider such an act a direct threat upon the lives of my children and I will take action accordingly. Is that clear enough for you?
Now if you have anything further to say to me, do it through your attorney. I'll be HAPPY to give him the address of MY attorney. Unlike you, I CAN afford one.
__________________
Need a kick-ass design done quickly?
I recommend Sex Creator - they absolutely ROCK.
Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 14 2003, 12:01 AM You attacked the financial health of a member of this board.
Plain and simple ...
Carrie HAS posted proof.
You keep bringing Acacia up, yet you've never been contacted by them and you're in Canada. Of course you're going to remain anonymous to them - they don't care.
And what "financial health" can you POSSIBLY be talking about? Has your site turned a profit? Do you not realize that NO ONE HERE will EVER do any business with you and we felt that way LONG before Carrie posted her proof? In fact, all of us who read your crap on GFY realized we wouldn't do any business with you LONG before you ever became a "member" of this site! :P
If you weren't so dangerous to children, I'd consider you nothing but a joke. I'm just glad there are people in Canada who have given your information to the police there.
"1. I have already posted proof - where your "essay" on child pornography INCLUDED pictures of children engaged in child pornography - as stated so yourself. I also said LadyM had screenshots - learn to read."
Wrong ...
THERE HAS NEVER BEEN GRAPHICS OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY ON SEXEDUCATION.COM
In that essay though - there is a very controversial graphic ...
However, the graphic is 2257 compliant.
And with Serge's permission I would post it (non-nude).
I thoughT she was "Tawnee Stone" originally ...
but I have since learned different ...by posting the graphic on GFY ...
it is 2257 compliant though ...
Doesn't matter anyways ...
the article
"Child Pornography - A Pictoral Essay by Dad@"
IS THREE FUCKING YEARS OLD ...UNALTERED !!!
The only one who complains is BE-A-TCHES like you.
grow the fuck up ...
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 08:01 PM
You said I had graphics of children engaged in sexual acts ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...
You said I admitted I was a pedophile ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...
YOU SHOULD BE BANNED AS YOU HAVE BROKE SERGE'S NUMBER ONE RULE.
You attacked the financial health of a member of this board.
Plain and simple ...
POST YOUR FUCKING PROOF ...
about these two statements ...
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
I have tried to avoid this one. Lord knows I already have my hands full with psychos, but....
Sexeducation,
One thing I have noticed about Carrie is that she researches her material well before posting it. If she has made a mistake, she seems to own up to it very quickly. I went and read some of your posts on GFY after reading her letter, and as a mother, I was left with a sick feeling in my stomach. I wouldn't want you anywhere near my kid, either.
If your site is for educating people about sex, including minors, then why are you hanging out on adult webmaster forums? Wouldn't any site dealing with sexual acts and catering to children, be tainted by the "stigma of pornography?" People tend to get in an uproar when you combine anything having to do with children, with pornography.
Originally posted by girlgeek@Nov 13 2003, 08:35 PM I have tried to avoid this one. Lord knows I already have my hands full with psychos, but....
Sexeducation,
One thing I have noticed about Carrie is that she researches her material well before posting it. If she has made a mistake, she seems to own up to it very quickly. I went and read some of your posts on GFY after reading her letter, and as a mother, I was left with a sick feeling in my stomach. I wouldn't want you anywhere near my kid, either.
If your site is for educating people about sex, including minors, then why are you hanging out on adult webmaster forums? Wouldn't any site dealing with sexual acts and catering to children, be tainted by the "stigma of pornography?" People tend to get in an uproar when you combine anything having to do with children, with pornography.
Just a thought from a curious bystander.
The job of the Webmaster of SexEducation.com is to invoke intercourse(social discussion - look it up).
I do my job to the best of my ability.
I have made mistakes and crossed the line more then once.
We all have.
I DO NOT cater to children - but yet I address on the behalf of Parents questions that come from those less then the age of minority (no longer).
I hang out on adult forums because there are some perversions I wish to terminate.
75% percent of those searching for sex are in "your" industry the rest are in mine.
I want the adult industry to help terminate some of the sickest shit I have ever learned about.
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
I want the adult industry to terminate Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).
I am not going away until this happens.
Dad@
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
Originally posted by Hell Puppy@Nov 13 2003, 08:52 PM I'll wait for the power point version of this thread....
I like short sentences, bullet points and diagrams....
np...
"Any cowardly Father that permits the circumcision of their daughter should be castrated." Dad@SexEducation.com
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 14 2003, 12:52 AM I want the adult industry to terminate Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).
I am not going away until this happens.
Dad@
Please show us one, just ONE, example of a webmaster who posts on any of the adult webmaster boards you frequent who sells/gives away pictures of female genital mutilation or promotes it.
Quote:
I have made mistakes and crossed the line more then once.
We all have.
We haven't all crossed the line as far as being a pedophile. In all my years on these boards and in the industry, you're the first I'm aware of.
Originally posted by Hubby+Nov 13 2003, 08:58 PM-->
QUOTE (Hubby @ Nov 13 2003, 08:58 PM)
Quote:
Originally posted by -sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 08:30 PM
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 08:47 PM The job of the Webmaster of SexEducation.com is to invoke intercourse(social discussion - look it up).
I do my job to the best of my ability.
I have made mistakes and crossed the line more then once.
We all have.
I DO NOT cater to children - but yet I address on the behalf of Parents questions that come from those less then the age of minority (no longer).
I hang out on adult forums because there are some perversions I wish to terminate.
75% percent of those searching for sex are in "your" industry the rest are in mine.
I want the adult industry to help terminate some of the sickest shit I have ever learned about.
I am aware of what social discussion is, smartass. I was merely trying to participate in an intellectual conversation with you by asking questions to clarify some facts. This is what people of above average intelligence do, when they want to expand their knowledge.
In some of your posts, you said that you have made your site available to minors, therefore catering to children. Maybe you should look that up.
You seem to have a problem with assumptions, but then you assume I am in the adult industry. Hasn't anyone told you that I am one of the resident computer geeks? However, you're probably close on the fact that 75% of my industry is searching for sex on the internet. It's one of the pitfalls of having limited social skills.
A wise devil once told me this, and I think it might help you in your quest to terminate some perversions in the adult industry:
You'd be lucky to get 10 people to agree on anything in this industry, much less a level of acceptable behavior.
Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 11:52 PM I want the adult industry to terminate Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).
I am not going away until this happens.
Dad@
The adult industry on the net does not practice or condone Female Genital mutilation......
and it is well out of our range to do a damn thing about it....
Most FGM occurs through religous/tribal or governmental ritual and custom...
Go to those countries and try to do something about it... because around here dude, you are preaching to the choir and it is a choir that does not want to hear anymore from you.....
You want to make changes, go out in the world and make changes...
You want to make money, this is the place to be....
Now quit your whining and either turn your domains into a true educational environment and go preach about them on the mainstream boards or turn them into porn sites and then shut the fuck up and learn something about the fucking business !!!
Originally posted by girlgeek@Nov 14 2003, 12:15 AM You seem to have a problem with assumptions, but then you assume I am in the adult industry. Hasn't anyone told you that I am one of the resident computer geeks?
I hereby dub thee... Lady Darci..... Honorary Pornographer ........
sarettah, and girlseek ...
I have to go to bed.
I have a long day tomorrow ...
not ignoring you ... cya ...
I think late Friday or very early Saturday ...
POOF ...
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 11:28 PM "1. I have already posted proof - where your "essay" on child pornography INCLUDED pictures of children engaged in child pornography - as stated so yourself. I also said LadyM had screenshots - learn to read."
Wrong ...
THERE HAS NEVER BEEN GRAPHICS OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY ON SEXEDUCATION.COM
In that essay though - there is a very controversial graphic ...
However, the graphic is 2257 compliant.
And with Serge's permission I would post it (non-nude).
I thoughT she was "Tawnee Stone" originally ...
but I have since learned different ...by posting the graphic on GFY ...
it is 2257 compliant though ...
Doesn't matter anyways ...
the article
"Child Pornography - A Pictoral Essay by Dad@"
IS THREE FUCKING YEARS OLD ...UNALTERED !!!
The only one who complains is BE-A-TCHES like you.
grow the fuck up ...
Post that pedo shit here and your gone.
__________________
We are putting the bastards of this world on notice; greed and corruption will always be met with "a voice made of ink and rage."
"Never try and be like anyone else" - Hunter S. Thompson
"The truth is the truth no matter how you try and package a lie" - Shellee Hale
sexed. can you answer these simple questions
1) why are you here on Oprano?
2) what do you hope to achieve by posting on this board
3) do you realise that not one person here wishes to discuss anything with you at all
4) do you realize that this is a place where people have resources and are not pretenders?
5) what would it take for you to just leave the board?
answer those, I shoud very much like to learn your views on them
I have good mates who know exactly who is who, where, and for what company/sites for all online personalities, and they have never been wrong.
But Sexeducation ... I cant find out a damn thing. Noone knows him ... which makes me think that he has very little contact (if any) .... or importance in this industry.
However, I was talking to my lawyer and mentioned Sexed. I was advised to not talk to him directly or even exchange arguments on any public online forum .... because if he was suspected or convicted of CP (I forget which) ... it could become messy for me. Said it was very unlikely, but ....
11-12-2003
Linear Mode
