DirectNics legal rights in relation to its recent actions

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by rhetorical

What is your point in all of this? I for one never disagreed with that. But thanks for doing the legwork. The problem is locking up the domain. They took punitive action which, even according to what you just posted, is beyond their perview.

If they had cancelled him his domains would have been down for a lot longer than the less than day or so they were down.

Which of the two would have been more punitive?

I think that anyone in the process that can take action against cp should, I don't care whether they are required to or not, I care whether they are allowed to. DN was clearly allowed to do what they did and should be getting cheers for daring to buck the adult community in the name of getting rid of cp instead of getting boycott threats and such.

If everyone that was allowed to, but not required to, report this kind of shit did then a whole lot more cp would come down a lot quicker.