Should Nats Be An Industry Watchdog?

taboo_gal · 08-10-2006

I'd say NATs is definitely founded in their position and resulting action. However, to come out publicly with names is a bit much in my opinion. Whatever went down on the phone/behind closed doors is one thing, to air it is another. I feel that there is a time, place and manner in which examples can be made while remaining discreet and not risk anyone's reputation. Playing Devil's Advocate for a sec, it could have been something as simple and inadvertent as a changed option in the admin or a new recruit changing something they shouldn't have (though the innocent don't often use profanity and hang up on someone, but I am not "in the know" and am being diplomatic). In any case, they should protect their brand and the choice to suspend until rectified is warranted.

View Poll Results: Should Nats Have Suspended Naked Rhino's License?
Yes - This Industry Needs a Watchdog	5	31.25%
No - Work on your own customer support issues	8	50.00%
Who gives a fuck. Wheres Nick3131's starving dog?	3	18.75%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

08-10-2006	#8
taboo_gal Members Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 94	Re: Should Nats Be An Industry Watchdog? I'd say NATs is definitely founded in their position and resulting action. However, to come out publicly with names is a bit much in my opinion. Whatever went down on the phone/behind closed doors is one thing, to air it is another. I feel that there is a time, place and manner in which examples can be made while remaining discreet and not risk anyone's reputation. Playing Devil's Advocate for a sec, it could have been something as simple and inadvertent as a changed option in the admin or a new recruit changing something they shouldn't have (though the innocent don't often use profanity and hang up on someone, but I am not "in the know" and am being diplomatic). In any case, they should protect their brand and the choice to suspend until rectified is warranted. __________________