you see the bullshit joesmoe did to my oprano points

MorganGrayson · 10-16-2005

Note to self: Purchase PD a Day Timer so that when the schedule gets this crowded with possibilities he will have the tools needed to function.

brand0n...it's not "unscaved," it's "unscathed." (Do not take offense at this, I do it to everyone. If anything, it should give you a nice feeling of inclusion.)

Frankly, you two gentlemen are long past beginning to bug. One of you is going to have to take the high road and stop responding to the other. Just because someone attempts to yank your chain does not mean you are compelled to allow your chain to be yanked. Keep your chain where others can't reach it.

A long time ago, somebody said to me "you just absolutely *have* to have the last word, don't you?" This person - OK, it was Nick - pointed out one of my worse flaws. I did in fact always have to have the last word. Not the most intelligent word. Not the "stinging retort." Not the most valid point. More along the lines of "beating a dead horse." I'd just keep on pissing way past any point of intelligence. I've had several indications lately that I've for the most part triumphed over that particular character flaw. (And one miserable thread with Serge that demonstrated I need to keep working on it lest I backslide. He gave me an "out," I stupidly didn't see it, and kept on posting.)

You two have fallen into the "I have to have the last word" game. Not the best words - they're always the same words. You both crave having the last word. Neither of you will win. You're just going to keep on posting the same damn words at each other.

How about one of you take the high road and post about something else?

10-16-2005	#11
MorganGrayson None $100 for every ImLive sign-up Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 4,321	Re: you see the bullshit joesmoe did to my oprano points Note to self: Purchase PD a Day Timer so that when the schedule gets this crowded with possibilities he will have the tools needed to function. brand0n...it's not "unscaved," it's "unscathed." (Do not take offense at this, I do it to everyone. If anything, it should give you a nice feeling of inclusion.) Frankly, you two gentlemen are long past beginning to bug. One of you is going to have to take the high road and stop responding to the other. Just because someone attempts to yank your chain does not mean you are compelled to allow your chain to be yanked. Keep your chain where others can't reach it. A long time ago, somebody said to me "you just absolutely have to have the last word, don't you?" This person - OK, it was Nick - pointed out one of my worse flaws. I did in fact always have to have the last word. Not the most intelligent word. Not the "stinging retort." Not the most valid point. More along the lines of "beating a dead horse." I'd just keep on pissing way past any point of intelligence. I've had several indications lately that I've for the most part triumphed over that particular character flaw. (And one miserable thread with Serge that demonstrated I need to keep working on it lest I backslide. He gave me an "out," I stupidly didn't see it, and kept on posting.) You two have fallen into the "I have to have the last word" game. Not the best words - they're always the same words. You both crave having the last word. Neither of you will win. You're just going to keep on posting the same damn words at each other. How about one of you take the high road and post about something else?