Oprano Front Page


Go Back   Oprano Adult Industry Forums > The Business Of Porn - Closed For Posting > Legacy Archived Main Board

Notices

Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.





Check Out YnotMail

The Original Oprano Flat Board (Thanks To Sarettah!)---
Oprano Swag Shop
"History Of Porn Timeline
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-28-2005   #1
sarettah
Stay Out Of The Box
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
sarettah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lost in the ozone
Posts: 10,318
Default Evolution or Intelligent Design or both ?

Ok, I'm not a believer in god and have always accepted the scientific method as the pretty much ruling method of figuring the validity of stuff, so usually I am on the side of arguing evolution over GOD. (I still would..lol)

But, it occurred to me yesterday, that as we get closer and closer to creating "life" in the laboratory, is that not proof that intelligent design is possible ? If we can create life, and further, create life to certain specifications than that could have been done in the past also.

Generally, the way us skeptics debunk magic is by proving that the same effect could be accomplished in the lab without use of magic. So, isn't creating life in the lab debunking the idea that life could not have been created ?

Again, I am not a believer in some all powerful omnipotent being, but that does not rule out some other creatures starting the whole process off.


Anyway, here's what sparked the post by reminding me of last night's epiphany....


http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...icle315384.ece

School defends its decision to teach 'intelligent design'
Published: 27 September 2005

In a crucial test case, education officials in rural Pennsylvania have defended their decision to require students to learn about an alternative theory to evolution to explain the origin of life.

Lawyers for the Dover area school board argued yesterday that the decision to teach intelligent design - a theory condemned by a majority of scientists as little more than "creationism-lite" - was not an attempt to force a religious agenda but a desire for pupils to keep an open mind.

"This case is about free inquiry in education, not about a religious agenda," argued Patrick Gillen of the Thomas More Law Centre, a non-profit Christian law firm which is representing the board.

The hearing is of huge significance. The Dover school board was the first in the country to make such a ruling but many other boards are watching the outcome of this case.

........................................
__________________


Free Adult Webcams
sarettah is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 PM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022