Soros raising $75 million in effort to defeat Bush

[PornoDoggy]

Originally posted by Mike AI@Aug 12 2003, 09:57 PM
Soros is an idiot who has so much money he is out of touch with REALITY....

It it not that I love BUSH, but to spend millions to DEFEAT someone is absurd... why don't Soros pick a candidate and support him with that money?

Does he really want Dean or some other nut cake to be running the country??

I wish the democrats would come back to earth ( at least the party activist ) because the technocrats that run the show are BEYOND liberal. They are out of touch with most Americans.... this is why there is a Republican countroled Congress, and White House - not to mention most state gov'ts!!

They need to get more mainstream candidates.... the problem is to win nomination you have to appeal to the berkely liberals....

I hope they Dean gets the nomination.... can you say McGovern? Dukakis?

I support Bush 100% on his foreign policy, and war on terror - but his domestic agenda sucks ass!! ( cutting taxs was a good however)

Mikey, Mikey, Mikey ... how many millions of dollars does the munitions lobby pour into defeating candidates every year? How many other groups, left and right, work hard to defeat politicians they disagree with? Or is it only bad when it's a liberal doing it?

And for a guy who believes his education superior to those of us plebian folks who went to public schools, it's a friggin shame they never taught you to count.

Your Republicans controll Congress is by a pretty slim margin, was elected in great part because of a perceived national emergency, and could be wiped out in the next election with a swing of less than 5% of the vote.

Your non-beloved leader (who you comparing him to this week? FDR? Reagan? Teddy Roosevelt?) was elected on a technicality. Yes, it is all constitutional - but it's a technicality nonetheless. And it doesn't take much of an imagination to realize just how tight your panties would be knotted if the election had been just as close but gone to Gore. Like I said, you put a Kennedy as governor of the contested state and a liberal justice (with two sons working for Gore's campaign) casting the deciding recount vote in the Supreme Court and we'd be rehashing the "Impeach William O Douglas" rhetoric of the 60s.

I happen to agree with your comparisson of Dean to McGovern. If my choice was between Bush and Dean I'd be hard-pressed to pick a candiate. I have never cared for extremists of any stripe. Bush may not be one himself - the jury's still out on that - but he owes way to much to them for me not to consider him one.

And Berkley liberals? Ohmygawd ... you borrowing lines from Morone now?



Last edited by PornoDoggy at Aug 12 2003, 10:17 PM