![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Fat Fucking Nobody
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
|
Video sites like YouTube and Google Video are sloppy about allowing TV shows and other copyrighted material on their sites -- and we all thank them for that -- but take a hard line against anything R-rated. Now we know why.
A few days ago, video sharing site Veoh pulled its "adult" category -- over 15 percent of its total content -- and banned nudity in its terms of service. The obvious, but wrong, reason was that Veoh, aching for some legitimate deals, didn't want to be known as the porny YouTube. After all, YouTube and all the other video sites ruthlessly kill porn vids. But the real reason came to light yesterday, when the Wall Street Journal reported that gay porn maker Io Group Inc. (aka Titan Media) sued Veoh for letting users share Io's copyrighted works of art. The period of infringement: June 1 to June 22, the time leading up to Veoh's buzzkill. Veoh spokesfolks said the porn may return -- as soon, I assume, as they can confirm it's all user-generated smut.
__________________
We are putting the bastards of this world on notice; greed and corruption will always be met with "a voice made of ink and rage." "Never try and be like anyone else" - Hunter S. Thompson "The truth is the truth no matter how you try and package a lie" - Shellee Hale
|
|
|
|

|
|
#2 |
|
Tossing Chairs and Blacking Out.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fairhaven Mass USA
Posts: 312
|
Titan has never lost a copyright infringement case. They are going after them for 40,000 images and last time Titan won they got almost $8k PER image
__________________
الرجل بلا شنب كالقط بلا ذ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|