If your considering copy and pasting your latest drive by spam here because you cant find any other place.
DONT!
Oprano has a ZERO tolerance policy for spam. Yours WILL be deleted. If you are looking for more exposure for your product please contact advertising@oprano.com for more information.
Legacy Archived Main BoardBusiness chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here.
"The State Department spent all their time trying to figure out how to live with Communism, Reagan spent all his time figuring out how to defeat Communism"
Newt Gingrich - on Reagan
Originally posted by JR@Jun 11 2003, 08:53 AM Newt Gingrich - on Reagan
Newt was kind of fat - don't you think that got heavy on Reagan after a while. Or maybe Ronnie was a bottom, he never struck me as one but you never know
p.s. JR - how do you get your hair to stand up like that in that picture, I love it and want to do it with mine
I won't have to use animal excrement will I
__________________
Pssst Click the Button Above
I once wanted to be a Gynecologist
But I couldn't find an opening
Originally posted by JR@Jun 11 2003, 08:53 AM "The State Department spent all their time trying to figure out how to live with Communism, Reagan spent all his time figuring out how to defeat Communism"
Newt Gingrich - on Reagan
JR ... fix your bot. Normally you are much more on point than this.
__________________ SEX STORY TEXT Exotic Material for Adult Websites Available for part time (project or ongoing) work ...
Originally posted by Bad Boy Rob@Jun 12 2003, 04:42 AM "Rumsfeld: Iran may have nukes soon " - Translation "We have Iraqs oil we now need Irans and a route for an oil pipe"
and this would be because we can successfully argue that Iran is a normal, stable country with a stable government that should have nuclear weapons?
Originally posted by Bad Boy Rob@Jun 12 2003, 04:52 AM
What right does America have to go and invade other countries solely on the belief that they may have WMD?
It would be alot easy to argue that George Bush is the worlds most dangerous individual and that while he is in power America should not have the right to have nuclear.
i did not say they had any "right" to do it.
why is the IAEA, Russia, EU and UN pushing Iran to come clean and they are refusing?
is a nuclear Iran a safe thing for anyone?
is it a reversable thing?
Originally posted by JR@Jun 12 2003, 05:03 AM are you saying "i dont like Bush, so Iran should have nuclear weapons"?
I am not sayig that because I think Bush is a maniac that illegally put himself in power that Iran should have nuclear weapons. Personally I think no-one should have nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by Bad Boy Rob@Jun 12 2003, 07:52 AM What right does America have to go and invade other countries solely on the belief that they may have WMD?
Might is right.
__________________ Almighty Content. Your one stop for live content.
Originally posted by Bad Boy Rob@Jun 12 2003, 07:42 AM "Rumsfeld: Iran may have nukes soon " - Translation "We have Iraqs oil we now need Irans and a route for an oil pipe"
Man you might want to read some books about the middle east and learn a little bit more about Irans' policies before you post about this subject again.
Speaking of books, I just finished reading The Hunt for Bin Laden by Robin Moore. It follows the Green Berets on the ground in Afghanistan on their missions against the Taliban and Al-Qaida. It gives a very good insight into modern day special forces warfare. A very impressive book indeed.
Task Force Dagger being the initial Green Beret task force inserted into Afghanistan right after 9/11 to link up with Northern Alliance generals and call in airstrikes etc.
Originally posted by Timon@Jun 12 2003, 11:09 AM The title is actually misleading, the book is more about the war against the Taliban than the search for Bin Laden.
I think because the story still lacks a good ending. Hopefully someday there will be a new edition with an addendum.
__________________ Almighty Content. Your one stop for live content.
Originally posted by JR@Jun 12 2003, 02:42 AM more to the point, i would say there is two basic strategies in the world regarding the middle east, fundamentalism and terrorism.
some countries are focused on "how do we modify their behavior"
some are focused on "how do we defeat this behavior"
Kind of an overly simplistic summary, don't you think?
I think that the approach which is limited to modifying their behavior has failed completely.
I think that there is plenty of historical precedent to indicate that a military approach to defeating their behavior will fail - Israel wouldn't exist, Vietnam would either be still two nations or non-Communist, and Afghanistan might still be Communist, come to mind immediately.
__________________ SEX STORY TEXT Exotic Material for Adult Websites Available for part time (project or ongoing) work ...
06-11-2003
Linear Mode
