Former Porn Kings Owner Sues Falcon Foto

[Toby]

SEATTLE - A lawsuit filed Wednesday by Aeroweb and Ian Eisenberg, formerly one of the owners of Porn Kings, seeks more than $200,000 from Falcon Foto and its owners, Jason Tucker and Gail Harris. more...

[Forest]

here we go again

[DaddyHalbucks]

Yipes, that can't be good for anyone.

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by Toby

SEATTLE - A lawsuit filed Wednesday by Aeroweb and Ian Eisenberg, formerly one of the owners of Porn Kings, seeks more than $200,000 from Falcon Foto and its owners, Jason Tucker and Gail Harris. more...

Ian is also the money behind Epic Cash amd several questionable schemes.

Do a search on Google using the keyword MARVAD

Hell you might do a search here on Oprano using the keyword MARVAD

[Rcourt64]

Originally Posted by gonzo

Ian is also the money behind Epic Cash amd several questionable schemes.

Do a search on Google using the keyword MARVAD

Hell you might do a search here on Oprano using the keyword MARVAD

Did someone say...

???

[Greg B]

"Falcon attorney Rob Apgood said Friday that his client had not been served notice of the suit.

"Aeroweb and Ian Eisenberg are not entitled to sue on the contract until March 2008, and then only if the contract is not satisfied at that time," he said. "By making public the details of [the promissory note] agreement, Aeroweb and Eisenberg are in substantial material breach of the terms of the agreement. As such, Falcon is entitled to, and shall seek, significant damages for Aeroweb's and Eisenberg's breach." "

---

Okay, this excerpt brings up the red flags as well. Best to just sit back and watch how this resolves itself for further applications. Gonzo seems to know more about this so I'll wait for his further commentary.

[Greg B]

Wait a minute. I knew something sounded familiar. Nevermind, Gonzo, this story is and data is getting juicier all the time.

[JFK]

Originally Posted by Greg B

Wait a minute. I knew something sounded familiar. Nevermind, Gonzo, this story is and data is getting juicier all the time.

bring it on

[seattleike]

Originally Posted by Greg B

"Falcon attorney Rob Apgood said Friday that his client had not been served notice of the suit.

"Aeroweb and Ian Eisenberg are not entitled to sue on the contract until March 2008, and then only if the contract is not satisfied at that time," he said. "By making public the details of [the promissory note] agreement, Aeroweb and Eisenberg are in substantial material breach of the terms of the agreement. As such, Falcon is entitled to, and shall seek, significant damages for Aeroweb's and Eisenberg's breach." "

---

Okay, this excerpt brings up the red flags as well. Best to just sit back and watch how this resolves itself for further applications. Gonzo seems to know more about this so I'll wait for his further commentary.

Tucker and Falcon have been properly served. The collections lawsuit progresses. Does anyone know if Tucker or Gail Harris have money?

[Jace]

Originally Posted by seattleike

Tucker and Falcon have been properly served. The collections lawsuit progresses. Does anyone know if Tucker or Gail Harris have money?

if you have to ask you are an idiot

[gonzo]

Originally Posted by seattleike

Tucker and Falcon have been properly served. The collections lawsuit progresses. Does anyone know if Tucker or Gail Harris have money?

Slow service Nov to Feb.

Courts must be backed up.