![]() |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Legacy Archived Main Board Business chat and general industry chat. All participation is welcome. Dont post your fucking spam here. |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
|
is illegal. It seems to me that if California is the only place you can do it in the land of the free, then move there. A lot of cohf was shot in Canada where it is legal and I don't think these guys are going to get busted. I like to be very legal myself and would certainly move to a jurisdiction where I could sleep easy staying on the right side of the law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Master of My Domains
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,701
|
Good question. To be honest, I'd be willing to bet that most people don't know that California is the only state where it's legal to produce porn.
__________________
Porn Site Pros - Custom Website Design, Turnkey Webcam and Pay Sites, SEO, and Consulting |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Members
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 768
|
Quote:
![]() Don't be so quick to judge the COHF guys as guilty. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Master of My Domains
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,701
|
Quote:
p.s. I don't think anyone here is judging them, although I sure question their intelligence considering the county they're in.
__________________
Porn Site Pros - Custom Website Design, Turnkey Webcam and Pay Sites, SEO, and Consulting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
|
When I moved to Vancouver last year, there was a news item about a raid on a house in a local suburb. They were looking for a grow op and were disappointed when they only found a bunch of Vietnamese guys making porn, so they left. But then again they hardly pay attention to grow ops anymore since it is our second largest export after lumber.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
|
Quote:
It's called a calculation of risk vs reward. People KNOW there is a precedant for allowing sexually excplicit performances for money under the 1st amendemt and choose to take the risks and lean on that precedant in their area of the circuit courts despite not having a ruling that covers them. IMHO any interpretation of the 1st amendment HAS to agree with the ruling that covers california but whether people are wiulling to stand behind those beliefs and test them in a court of law is an entirely different matter altogether. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Administrator
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,618
|
I assume this is a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,165
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|