Quote:
Originally Posted by sarettah
I spent 2 minutes this morning researhing the actual laws for the U.S. and basically confirmed what I already knew.
This is no law restricting creadit cards or debit cards by age other than what you cited which is that you have to be 18 to enter into a contract.
The actual law dealing with credit cards that started this thread is changing from 18 to 21 to get a credit card without proof of income basically. You can still get one if you have a c0-signer or if you can provide proof that you can pay the bill. So basically anyone with a $10.00 an hour job over 18 that is not encumbered could get a cc.
On credit cards, you can have one at any age if someone makes you a secondary card holder on their card. Now, some banks have policies restricting this by age.
Back when they tried to get Coppa through and had the part in there about using a cc to provide proof of age I knew that it would not work.
'Sides, even on the various consumer sites they warn not to use a cc or debit card as proof of age or identity.
As far as using for payment, a debit card is a hell of a lot harder to charge back on then a cc.
On a cc, you are by law (in the US) limited to like $50.00 of liability on a lost or stolen card. On a debit card there is no such law. There is a "courtesy policy" that some issuers have established that says they will limit the liability but from what I could find there is no legal limit on liability if you lose or have a debit card stolen. So as a form of payment, a debit card is actually probably more secure for the merchant than a cc.
just my two cents of course.
|
Yes, exactly my point. Debit cards don't fall under the credit card statute for chargebacks, thus making it nearly impossible/not feasible to do a chargeback. So why restrict them? (If you roll back, you'll see that was my original query to you.) The $50 chargeback provision is a function of the credit laws, and not specifically a MC/Visa issue. There is also a mile from limitation on that. (This also gets a bit "fuzzy" when we talk about the internet, because what is the point of sale? Your terminal? The merchant's "store," or the last server to pass the "product?" --But let's not wander off on a tangent here....)
You cite 2 different 18/21 situations.
I was referring to the long standing "local standard for pornography access," i.e. local jurisdictional laws allowing someone to buy playboy/porn vid in a local store, which STILL hasn't been "settled" by the tinternet delivery of the same content. You could still run afoul of those laws, as many in the industry have found out, and we, in the video store found out in the 80's.
The other 18/21 thing is a change in credit card issuance to college students with the fabulous new consumer credit laws that were supposed to help us po' 'mericans so much, and has little or nothing to do with this conversation topic.
And MC/Visa is not above the law. The simple fact is, MC/Visa guidelines, or no guideline, a minor cannot enter into a contract. a "loan," i.e., a credit transaction is a promise to pay back contract. So, regardless of what uncle/parent/sibling "signs" for them before hand, ultimately, the whole thing would get tossed if they were a minor. Now, at the point of sale, if the parent signs, I would bet they would be the one entering the "contract," and the minor's signature would mean nothing.
Again, we are slicing and dicing something that would never reach this point. The bacnk would just do the chargeback, and send you, the merchant, an "F-U" card. They might not even send the card. :-)