Quote:
Originally Posted by LizAEBN
For me, the problem becomes who gets to draw that line in the sand and decide what is a "bad intention"? Who's to say that my church isn't "bad" because I (hypothetically) I believe Jesus was the son of G_d - or that he was a heretic? Or because I don't believe in G_d at all?
So, yeh, Muslims following their faith as they interpret it should be allowed to assemble in like groups. If Americans are honest about it, our nation was begun by "terrorists." Not all attacks are Islamic in origin, either - despite popular perception.
Frankly, white male Protestants frighten me much more. So, again, the question becomes - who draws the line in the sand about what's acceptable? I don't like the questions the Max case raises because it becomes an incredibly slippery slope. I know people who genuinely enjoy being choked with cock or pissed on. I am not going to say they are wrong for that, because to do so means someone, somewhere, will say that if it's wrong to do a throat-choke, someone else will think that a cream pie or facial is just as wrong.
It's a dangerous fucking line to walk. I like freedom, and I am not a fan of the idea of a nanny state.
|
Freedom is a nice word but you cant yell fire in a crowded theatre. There are lines if you want to cross them you got to be willing to pay the price. Also if the chicks were really into what he was doing I can see that but I have heard a bunch of stories where that isnt the case at all. girls new to the biz have no idea who he is.Are sent by dont give a fuck agents.In the words of the senator who told Paul cambria you dont police yourselves we will do it for you. unfortunately our industry is too short sighted to do it themselves.