Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer
If the photos of the minor are obviously displayed to appeal to prurient interests, I'm pretty sure it will qualify as CP and based on the descriptions I doubt they were innocent photos of a nude girl but rather the girl posing provocatively for her boyfriend.
|
so you are agreeing with me on the subjectivity of the porn or art debate. Hammer, a 17 year old kid with pics of a 16 year old is hardly grounds for a kiddy porn charge. Only in America.