Quote:
Originally Posted by EmporerEJ
What the hell is that supposed to mean?
The "framers" would be a "didn't," but even with that, your statement makes no sense.
|
Sorry for the one letter typo. The point is you are attempting to make an absolute statement on something that even the surpreme court hasn't been able to completely agree on. If it was strictly a right to bear arms, there would be no need to mention militias, now would there?
Sorry if we can't make reality meet up with the facts you are attempting to create.