Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
From what I could understand, NATS wasn't so much going to give access as "provide numbers" or provide a limited dataset access.
Where I get a little confused on all this is Blake and the 9 epass accounts. Were the rebillings occurring and then all getting paid off to Blake instead of to the webmasters? Was Blake using his access to the systems to somehow skim rebills? Is there a theoretical half million sitting in an account somewhere unpaid, or was it filtered off to someone else? If the totals still added up, why would NATS get involved?
Where did the money go?
On the other side of the coin, the amount claimed is steep, but if the company was turning half a million a year, it is ALMOST justifiable. But then the $5000 buyout for 50% of the company sort of negates it, unless Blake and Amy were getting paid in some other manner (see the "shave" above).
In the end, even if NR was a pretty weird setup, there is likely very little way to excuse John's outbursts on the boards which almost certainly tarnished some reputations.
|
with 9 epassport accounts. Has anyone every had more then 2 epassport account with the same company, unless Blake pulled some heavy internal epassport strings, not possible... these were epassport accounts that brandi testified she didn't know about.. but later on in the same deposition when asked how was mailman paid.. hum 'epassport?' Same goes for her accusation of the multiple paypal accounts under the same company creditcard.... anyone ever had more then 1 paypal account with the same credit card??