Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchMark
Um, Moe.. (can I call you Moe?)
I have already said I'm not an expert. I already asked you to prove me wrong. I already told you that I will apologize if I am wrong.
Now you can even make me your BITCH if I am wrong.
But you can't.
It's you that looks like a complete fool here.
Tell you what. I'll give you another 15 minutes to prove ANYTHING of what you have said, or take me up on ANY of my SIMPLE challenges to obtain ANY MAC address.
IF you can't do it by 5:30pm eastern time (15 minutes from now), then we'll know you're just talkin' shit.
Ok? Ok.
m
|
You are already my bitch, punk.
Look inside a TCP packet. That is
easy to do.
I have already made my point, you are just chattering on and on and on.
Point was and is: it is common knowledge that MAC address tracking is possible. That is how you were caught posting under another account.
How do you track it?
By looking inside a TCP packet. It's RIGHT in there! HAHAHAHAHA
All the other BS you tried to pile on to the discussion is just that. BS. Why don't companies use it? ETC ETC:
IRRELEVANT to the point I made, and have proved.
That wasn't a hint, that was a direct answer. If you are not capable of understanding it, that's your problem Jack.
NOT giving you a freebie under the pretense of meeting your "challenges" or playing your little games. I could care less about that. I done know what I am talking about, whereas you are just putting on a clown show in an attempt to get out of having been caught posting under another account, which it was my intention to refute, and which I did. Plain and simple.
Anyone reading this who knows TCP/IP knows that the information I posted is accurate. And that's that. Go on, keep chattering.