Just so we are clear here from what I wrote in the previous post.
This is me saying parents only:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEnforcer
Ok, fair enough. I think you didn't realize I was really talking about what I think should be done about it. Would you still be fine with it if it made it mandatory for all adult sites to label their sites with tags that can be used by parents to block their sites? So basically porn sites have to "tag" their sites with an tag like the ICRA or soemthing similar.
|
This is you agreeing that is ok:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw
|
This is you now contradicting yourself just a few short posts later:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw
This is were your analogy fails. The bouncer is employed by the establishment not by someone else. He listens to the person that signs his check.
In your analogy, that TAG is not an employee of the establishment, but rather could easily be a police officer or FBI agent standing at the door, telling everyone that they cannot enter.
Would you allow a law enforcement officer to guard your establish and determine freely who could and could not enter ? Thats what you MAY get if you require tags on websites.
Mandatory filtering is never going to fly.
That's the whole argument behind why .XXX died. It could easily be filtered.
So I suppose you were/are an ardent supporter of .XXX. Well at least I now know that I met one. Unlike the Loch Ness Monster, Big Foot and UFOs, I guess they do exist.
Michael
http://www.adultbizlaw.com |