Quote:
|
Making them use a tag that the END USER has to implement is NOT censorship. It's akin to having an empoyee/bouncer who cards people and keeps minor out in the stores you own.
|
This is were your analogy fails. The bouncer is employed by the establishment not by someone else. He listens to the person that signs his check.
In your analogy, that TAG is not an employee of the establishment, but rather could easily be a police officer or FBI agent standing at the door, telling everyone that they cannot enter.
Would you allow a law enforcement officer to guard your establish and determine freely who could and could not enter ? Thats what you MAY get if you require tags on websites.
Mandatory filtering is never going to fly.
That's the whole argument behind why .XXX died. It could easily be filtered.
So I suppose you were/are an ardent supporter of .XXX. Well at least I now know that I met one. Unlike the Loch Ness Monster, Big Foot and UFOs, I guess they do exist.
Michael
http://www.adultbizlaw.com