View Single Post
Old 02-22-2008   #24
TheEnforcer
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
TheEnforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
Default Re: Vivid says no to porn

Software that is piss poor and doesn't have uniform standards and also lets webmasters totally of the hook with no responsibility at all. What makes webmasters a more special class of business operator than brick and mortar sex shops? Tell me why sex shops have to have a MUCH higher burden than a webmaster? Because with the line of thinking I've seen espoused in this thread it should also be a-ok for any minor in amercia to walk right in and look at everything in a sex shop with no burden on the owner at all. It's all the parents responsibility to make sure they don't go to that sex shop. I mean who cares if you see a kid who looks like they are underage walk into your shop it's not your responsibility at all to keep them out right? Hyperbole? A bit perhaps, but that is EXACTLY what parents and politicians hear when these lines of thought are told to them. They think all you care about is prepping future clients to buy your stuff or just wantign their money outright not caring what they think about it.

Also, COPA and what I am talking about are NOT analogous. COPA required paid access and other unreasonable things of that nature. All I'm talking about is a system similar to ICRA that webmaters have to put on their domain and requires action on the parents side to be used and made active.
TheEnforcer is offline   Reply With Quote