View Single Post
Old 02-21-2008   #3
TheEnforcer
Scored VIP to Anton's Piss Tank
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
TheEnforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,781
Default Re: Vivid says no to porn

Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post
Assuming that exposure to sexual explicit images turns kids into sex maniacs and dysfunctional members of society is also somewhat draconian.

As an undergrad, I was a psyche and criminal justice double major, I researched and wrote a 185 page thesis page on the developmental occurrences in the childhood of 5 serial killers.

The mere exposure to sex was not a factor in developmental problems. What was -- watching their mothers - get sexually abused and used was.

Children have through-out time been exposed to sex and society has survived. For the most part many early homes/tee-pees/cave dwellings were 1 room dwellings. And being one room dwellings kids were exposed to their parents and other adults having sex. And we survived.

Granted Im not sure what exposure to violent pornography will do to a child and there are no studies on such, but seeing naked bodies and naked bodies in passionate embraces doesnt result in a breakdown in societal norms, customs and laws.

I say that with filtering will come censorship. Filters are not perfect. They catch all kinds of info - like teaching kids to wear condoms to avoid STDs if they are going to have sex. Perhaps a topic they might feel a little funny discussing with their moms and prefer to search Google for.

Michael

http://www.AdultBizLaw.com

Here's your problem. NO ONE CARES about those studies. You can cite them until you are blue in the face from talking so much the vast majority of parents and politicians will ignore it. Hell there are people in thi industry that think the more extreme stuff like gagging, puking, etc. does this busines more harm than good so how do you think that politicians and parents are gonna feel about that? A site that is nothing but solo girls or girl girl action is viewed no different by most politicians and parents than a site with cumshots, double penetrations, etc. etc. It's porn and while some may be more extreme than others to them it's all still porn.

So, why not actually work with politicans and parents and come up with something that, unlike adult stores and bars, places the burden on the parents to keep their kids out but is also effective and that every parent can use? NO ONE is telling you that you can't publish the material at all. Just that you would be cooperating with keeping porn out of kids hands.
TheEnforcer is offline   Reply With Quote