[gonzo]

Originally Posted by CJTraffic

Yeah, while you're searching see how many of them didn't leave the table happy? Anyone who's content made it up ACCIDENTALLY we turned it into a FREE ad spot for them. We NEVER posted anyone's content that was watermarked unless it was an advertisement.

Calling us a "tube" site is bullshit man and I take serious offense to that. We passed up on SO MUCH FUCKING money over the years because we WOULDN'T do what our competitors did. Because we DID know / care about folks in the biz and didn't go around stealing content. CJ would have sold for a SHIT ton more if we'd done that but we DIDN'T. Don't generalize and don't misrepresent the truth man. I BUSTED my ass since 1999 building that business to be a REPUTABLE business. Now that we've sold it folks seem to think it's fine and dandy to throw out pot-shots like what you just did. Well it's not. It's wrong. Just because we sold that business doesn't mean we're not damn proud of the work we did. Gonzo I'm incredibly disappointed to see someone of your caliber behaving this way.

Your right Mark. Comparing you to a tube is inaccurate. I was discussing this with several people last week and I realize that statement was wrong.

As for the other comment I stand by it as I only have a personal experience to draw from recalling Carly having a HELL of a time getting her content removed from that site.

Did she leave the table happy? I dont think it ever got removed Mark.
I can certainly ask her.

But since youve come by....you dont think its wrong or unethical to sell off the domains and then a week later [using your own website as a source] turn on the very same content to compete with the new owners?

Before you answer. I know who bought the collection of domains and it couldnt happen to a nicer person but the question still remains.

Do you consider it wrong or unethical?