I'm thinking that since Jim was only the affiliate manager and not a producer that he should be considered a secondary producer by the FSC.
Now that 4472 has lumped us all together and there is no longer such a thing as a 'secondary producer' what is the FSC's criteria. They protect webmasters that did not actually produce the content but not webmasters that did produce their own content? And what if you produce some of your own content but also use purchased content. Are you protected for the purchased stuff but not the stuff you produced?