Oprano Adult Industry Forums - View Single Post

MorganGrayson · 12-02-2005

I put a few important - to me, anyway - passages in bold for commentary.

By CHRISTOPHER WILLS

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) - A federal judge ruled Friday that Illinois' restrictions on the sale of violent and sexually explicit video games to minors are unconstitutional and barred the state from enforcing the law.

State officials "have come nowhere near" demonstrating that the law passes constitutional muster, said U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kennelly.

Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich and other supporters of the measure argued that children were being harmed by exposure to games in which characters go on killing sprees or sexual escapades.

Opponents declared the law a restriction on free speech and pointed out that similar laws had been struck down in other states.

"It's unfortunate that the state of Illinois spent taxpayer money defending this statute. This is precisely what we told them would happen," said David Vite, president of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, one of the groups that sued over the law.

Blagojevich said Friday he will appeal the ruling.

"Parents should be able to expect that their kids will not have access to excessively violent and sexually explicit video games without their permission," he said. *1

Other states this year approved similar legislation after hidden sex scenes were discovered in a popular game, "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas." California's version, set to go into effect Jan. 1, is among those being challenged in court.

The Illinois law, which also was to go into effect Jan. 1, would have barred stores from selling or renting extremely violent or sexual games to minors and allowed $1,000 fines for violators.

The judge said that it would interfere with the First Amendment and that there wasn't a compelling enough reason, such as preventing imminent violence, to allow that.
"In this country, the state lacks the authority to ban protected speech on the ground that it affects the listener's or observer's thoughts and attitudes," Kennelly wrote. *2

*1 Raise your damned kids. Monitor your children's activities. Don't depend on the government to raise them for you. This is a recording.

*2 A US District Court Judge just stated there that the state lacks the authority to ban protected speech on the grounds that it affects the listeners/observers thoughts and attitudes. I wonder what that will do to all the anti-pornography advocates who determinedly state that "pornography" results in sex crimes, etc.? Judge Kennelly did not state "actions," but those "actions" would arise as a result of "thoughts and attitudes.

I wonder what, if any, effect this ruling will have on material aimed at adults?

12-02-2005	#1
MorganGrayson None $100 for every ImLive sign-up Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 4,321	Court Strikes Down Ill. Video Game Law I put a few important - to me, anyway - passages in bold for commentary. By CHRISTOPHER WILLS SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) - A federal judge ruled Friday that Illinois' restrictions on the sale of violent and sexually explicit video games to minors are unconstitutional and barred the state from enforcing the law. State officials "have come nowhere near" demonstrating that the law passes constitutional muster, said U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kennelly. Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich and other supporters of the measure argued that children were being harmed by exposure to games in which characters go on killing sprees or sexual escapades. Opponents declared the law a restriction on free speech and pointed out that similar laws had been struck down in other states. "It's unfortunate that the state of Illinois spent taxpayer money defending this statute. This is precisely what we told them would happen," said David Vite, president of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, one of the groups that sued over the law. Blagojevich said Friday he will appeal the ruling. "Parents should be able to expect that their kids will not have access to excessively violent and sexually explicit video games without their permission," he said. 1 Other states this year approved similar legislation after hidden sex scenes were discovered in a popular game, "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas." California's version, set to go into effect Jan. 1, is among those being challenged in court. The Illinois law, which also was to go into effect Jan. 1, would have barred stores from selling or renting extremely violent or sexual games to minors and allowed $1,000 fines for violators. The judge said that it would interfere with the First Amendment and that there wasn't a compelling enough reason, such as preventing imminent violence, to allow that. "In this country, the state lacks the authority to ban protected speech on the ground that it affects the listener's or observer's thoughts and attitudes," Kennelly wrote.* 2 1 Raise your damned kids. Monitor your children's activities. Don't depend on the government to raise them for you. This is a recording. 2 A US District Court Judge just stated there that the state lacks the authority to ban protected speech on the grounds that it affects the listeners/observers thoughts and attitudes. I wonder what that will do to all the anti-pornography advocates who determinedly state that "pornography" results in sex crimes, etc.? Judge Kennelly did not state "actions," but those "actions" would arise as a result* of "thoughts and attitudes. I wonder what, if any, effect this ruling will have on material aimed at adults?