theres a better article for this:
http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.d...510080427/1039
Not the brightest to go on CNN. But according to the article, this has nothing to do with the war photos and everything to do with the adult photos. The photos in question are described as "revenge photos," which doesn't make sense to me as obscenity. Sounds like it would be more of a 2257 issue with regards to record keeping and consent, but not obscenity. I also haven't seen the pictures.
The bottom line is, no matter what - you lose. Even if you win the case, you lose because of the legal bills. And no one should say he deserved this, this should be wished up no one what he is about to go through.