Originally Posted by XxXotic

if you say so Dr. Phil. I'd worry less about trying to psycho-analyze my posts and more about the real point here. I didn't say Kerry would do a better job, though in my opinion a fresh pile of dog shit could do a better job then Bush has. I'm not angry, or upset... there's no point to it. How do you figure I'm acting like a 5 year old? Because I backed up someone's point which was valid? Get over yourself long enough to realize it was in fact a valid point that he made. Nothing more. And once you're done getting over yourself, please tell me how I have the "reasoning of a 5 year old" because I said what I did? Sorry, if it makes me a 5 year old to think that anyone whose only response is "would so and so do a better job" is a fucking idiot. Who cares who *would have* done a better job, the fact is it's Bush's job and he's fucked up monumentally.

You're too hung up on the what if's and not the what is. Maybe when you actually reach the reasoning levels of a 5 year old, you'll understand that point.

And for the record, if I believe something, I'll let you know, until then do me the favor of not putting words in my mouth.