Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JR
asking the question "would kerry have done it all better" is not an admission of anything, not a defense of anything and certainly not proof of someone being wrong. to state that is, also assumes that Kerry would have been better which simply cannot be proven. you might want to believe it and thats fine. but it can't be proven. are you starting to see the flaws in your logic yet? be angry, thats fine... be upset... great! but do try to be rational and not resort to the reasoning of a 5 year old to defend your point.
what you are trying to say in a very backwards and illogical way is that YOU feel everyone who voted for bush was wrong and that YOU are angry and upset.
|
if you say so Dr. Phil. I'd worry less about trying to psycho-analyze my posts and more about the real point here. I didn't say Kerry would do a better job, though in my opinion a fresh pile of dog shit could do a better job then Bush has. I'm not angry, or upset... there's no point to it. How do you figure I'm acting like a 5 year old? Because I backed up someone's point which was valid? Get over yourself long enough to realize it was in fact a valid point that he made. Nothing more. And once you're done getting over yourself, please tell me how I have the "reasoning of a 5 year old" because I said what I did? Sorry, if it makes me a 5 year old to think that anyone whose only response is "would so and so do a better job" is a fucking idiot. Who cares who *would have* done a better job, the fact is it's Bush's job and he's fucked up monumentally.
You're too hung up on the what if's and not the what is. Maybe when you actually reach the reasoning levels of a 5 year old, you'll understand that point.
And for the record, if I believe something, I'll let you know, until then do me the favor of not putting words in my mouth.