Quote:
Originally posted by Lee@Jun 23 2005, 07:57 PM
You mean other than potential access to the full FSC member list?
Go after someone who isnt an FSC member, get them to cop a plea, the government gets to prove their new regulation actually work, in a court of law.
Go after someone on the FSC member list, charge them with something, have the full list unsealed.
Its win-win for the DOJ.
|
why would they need the FSC members list to achieve this? they still would have to do inspections and i would guess that the assumption would be the FSC members are more likely to be in compliance than the average idiot in this business. the government does not go after long shots.. they go after slam dunks. having a list of FSC members is not proof of anything and its not meaningful information that could not be obtained through other means.
no one can just charge someone with something without verifying that a crime was committed and a law was broken.... correct?
your logic is pretty flawed.